From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Amerigo Wang Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 09:04:17 +0000 Subject: Re: [Patch 0/7] Implement crashkernel=auto Message-Id: <4A7A9C91.6070002@redhat.com> List-Id: References: <20090805112123.6552.73574.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20090805140408.GJ7259@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> <4A7A3A78.7080200@redhat.com> <4A7A506B.2060008@redhat.com> <4A7A70E5.2010204@redhat.com> <4A7A7A0F.6070906@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Neil Horman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar , Anton Vorontsov , Andi Kleen , Bernhard Walle Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Hmm. I half take it back. How is crashkernel=auto and then shrinking > the reserved size better than the extended syntax Bernhard Walle > introduced nearly two years ago? > You mean something like crashkernelQ2M-2G:64M,2G-:128M? Isn't it longer and more complex than "crashkernel=auto" for an end user? Hmm, this makes me to think that "crashkernel=auto" can be a replacement for that extended syntax...