From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 08:57:55 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: don't use vmalloc_end Message-Id: <4B1E1513.3020000@kernel.org> List-Id: References: <4B1D3A3302000078000241CD@vpn.id2.novell.com> <20091207153552.0fadf335.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4B1E1B1B0200007800024345@vpn.id2.novell.com> <4B1E0E56.8020003@kernel.org> <4B1E1EE60200007800024364@vpn.id2.novell.com> In-Reply-To: <4B1E1EE60200007800024364@vpn.id2.novell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jan Beulich Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On 12/08/2009 05:39 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> Tejun Heo 08.12.09 09:29 >>> >> Hmm... it shouldn't be building. > > How can it not be building? It's in vmalloc.c (which must be built) and not > inside any conditional. Ah... yes, right. Somehow I was thinking it lived in percpu.c. Sorry about that. Probably the right thing to do is to wrap the function inside CONFIG ifdef's. I'll prep a patch. Thanks. -- tejun