From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christophe JAILLET Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 19:45:14 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ia64: topology: Fix an error handling path in cache_add_dev() Message-Id: <78d00a13-3cee-386c-07f1-8d16a24e4e67@wanadoo.fr> List-Id: References: <452b20c160a20754022407acefd2abb170f43d14.1648494330.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Tony Luck , Zhang Yanmin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Le 28/03/2022 à 21:16, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit : > Hi Christophe! > > On 3/28/22 21:07, Christophe JAILLET wrote: >> If kobject_init_and_add()fails, kobject_put() needs to be called. >> Add the missing call which is already there a few lines below in another >> error handling path. >> >> Fixes: f19180056ea0 ("[IA64] Export cpu cache info by sysfs") >> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET > > Thanks for your patches. There is currently no maintainer for ia64, so the patches > would have to go through Andrew Morton's tree. > > However, I can test the patches and verify they don't break anything. > > Adrian > Hi, digging deeper for other potential same issues in other file, I don't think that this patch is needed, and I don't think that it fixes anything. The "name" of this kobject is "%s", "cache". So nothing needs to be freed for that because kstrdup_const() will be used. This kobject has no .release function. If the add() part of kobject_init_and_add(), then 'state_in_sysfs' will still be 0, so nothing needs to be released for that either. So, adding a kobject_put() would just be a no-op here (if I understand correctly). I've been puzzled by the kobject_put() later, but in this case, _add() has already succeeded and state_in_sysfs=1 and the call is needed. For the other patch, it is just a clean-up. Based on Wikipedia, IA64 is discontinued, so such clean-up does not make that much sense either. (on the other hand, it should be eay to review and apply :) ) I don't think you need to spent time on it. Sorry for the noise. CJ