From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Ellerman Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 01:11:28 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] ia64: reuse append_elf_note() and final_note() functions Message-Id: <874m0evhof.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> List-Id: References: <148363729327.11570.6244765717789390817.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com> <148363740554.11570.4870634597647436827.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com> <20170106020324.GB2863@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <38a7807c-cd95-670d-30d3-c45e7921ea11@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <0748026f-a459-9022-3658-a75cb0633f40@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <04b96f50-f77d-9446-975f-7d44accfe583@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Tony Luck , Hari Bathini Cc: "Yu, Fenghua" , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , Dave Young , kexec-ml , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Eric W. Biederman" , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "vgoyal@redhat.com" Tony Luck writes: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Hari Bathini > wrote: >> I haven't gotten a success/failure build report from zero-day. Not sure what >> to make of it. > > zero-day is generally silent unless it sees a problem. So no news is good news. > >> But I did try cross-compiling and it was successful. Should that do? > > I guess so. What tree do these apply to? I tried 4.10-rc5 and "git am" > protested ... but I didn't look closely as at why. Don't worry about it, I do an ia64_defconfig build as part of my usual tests before pushing. cheers