From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/16] ia64: fix up obsolete cpu function usage.
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 01:30:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mw0qn7h0.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+8MBbJiQeP3SHoqM+D0v6q5oOvaDgwr7RnFNJZ=TS8oPpoa5A@mail.gmail.com>
Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:35 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
>> Thanks to spatch, then a sweep for for_each_cpu_mask => for_each_cpu.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
>
> I'm seeing a bunch of warnings building the ia64 tree:
Indeed, here's the forgotten fix sitting in my patch collection.
> Should cpumask_set_cpu() and friends specify a volatile argument???
It's weird, but it turns out hardly anyone wants that.
Cheers,
Rusty.
ia64: make cpu_callin_map non-volatile.
cpumask_test_cpu() doesn't take volatile, unlike the obsoleted
cpu_isset. The only place ia64 really cares is the spin waiting for a
bit; udelay() is probably a barrier but insert rmb() to be sure.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/smpboot.c
index 15051e9c2c6f..629975b56608 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ int smp_num_siblings = 1;
volatile int ia64_cpu_to_sapicid[NR_CPUS];
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ia64_cpu_to_sapicid);
-static volatile cpumask_t cpu_callin_map;
+static cpumask_t cpu_callin_map;
struct smp_boot_data smp_boot_data __initdata;
@@ -477,6 +477,7 @@ do_boot_cpu (int sapicid, int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
for (timeout = 0; timeout < 100000; timeout++) {
if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &cpu_callin_map))
break; /* It has booted */
+ rmb(); /* Make sure we re-read cpu_callin_map */
udelay(100);
}
Dprintk("\n");
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-27 1:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1425296150-4722-1-git-send-email-rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2015-03-02 11:47 ` [PATCH 03/16] ia64: Use for_each_cpu_and() and cpumask_any_and() instead of temp var Rusty Russell
2015-03-02 11:47 ` [PATCH 06/16] ia64: fix up obsolete cpu function usage Rusty Russell
2015-05-26 20:45 ` Tony Luck
2015-05-27 1:30 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2015-05-27 17:37 ` Tony Luck
2015-05-28 3:56 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mw0qn7h0.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox