From: Takao Indoh <indou.takao@soft.fujitsu.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make INIT# handler call panic
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 00:55:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8FC4C7891B9A9Dindou.takao@soft.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1099662943.913.180.camel@clarsen>
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:53:38 -0500, Philip R Auld wrote:
>> Normally BUG() invokes exception handler and dump function is called.
>> But, I am not sure exception handler is correctly invoked from the INIT
>> context.
>
>This doesn't currently do much in ia64 as far as I can tell. It ends up
>in die via die_if_kernel, but that doesn't look like it will ever get to a
>machine restart, much less a crash dump or even a for(;;) loop. I may be
>missing something though. I'm pretty new to Itanium.
>
>In i386 there is panic_on_oops in die which can at least get to the
>panic call chain (as there used to be in ia64).
>
>None of the dump stuff is in the stock kernels yet is it?
There is not dump stuff.
>> >> My personal preference would be something like this:
>> >> 1) dump register state (for all CPUs, not just the INIT monarch)
>> >> on the console
>> >> 2) print backtraces (maybe just for currently-running tasks;
>> >> currently we do the task on the INIT monarch plus all other
>> >> non-running tasks, which is definitely non-optimal)
>> >> 3) optional debugger/crashdump hook
>> >> 4) call panic (maybe)
>> >> 5) optional timeout, then reboot (if not calling panic)
>> >>
>> >> Part 5 would be trivial and probably not *too* controversial.
>> >> Part 1 is harder but extremely useful, and I think someone (Zoltan?)
>> >> posted a start. Part 2 should be simple given part 1.
>> >
>> >I'll see what I can do about most of these. Part 1 would be
>> >difficult since the hardware/firmware we've currently got
>> >available makes both processors the monarch on INIT.
>>
>> Even if crashdump hook is added into the init_handler, dump does not
>> work correctly because of single INIT stack. Therefore Russ Anderson's
>> patch which separates INIT stack is also indispensable.
>>
>
>We are still mostly a working with 2.4 (rhel3 which has netdump_func hooks)
>and this all worked fine. A crashdump hook, a call to panic, or a call
>to BUG each worked.
Crashdump itself succeeds, but isn't there any problem in analyzing
dump? Backtrace of "current" on each cpu seem to not work because
switch_stack is not saved correctly.
Regards,
Takao Indoh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-11 0:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-05 13:55 [PATCH] make INIT# handler call panic Cliff Larsen
2004-11-05 16:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2004-11-05 21:04 ` Cliff Larsen
2004-11-05 22:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2004-11-05 22:57 ` Cliff Larsen
2004-11-05 23:04 ` Russ Anderson
2004-11-08 12:14 ` Takao Indoh
2004-11-10 15:53 ` Philip R Auld
2004-11-11 0:55 ` Takao Indoh [this message]
2004-11-11 1:14 ` Luck, Tony
2004-11-11 17:12 ` Cliff Larsen
2004-11-11 17:18 ` Cliff Larsen
2004-11-11 17:33 ` Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8FC4C7891B9A9Dindou.takao@soft.fujitsu.com \
--to=indou.takao@soft.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox