From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jesper Juhl" Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:38:45 +0000 Subject: Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH] [REVIEW] Fix irqpoll on IA64 (timer interrupt != 0) Message-Id: <9a8748490703191138y7ff45fdbl538d2a941414817e@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: References: <20070319181336.GC12628@strauss.suse.de> <9a8748490703191129h396211e9q59eeea9533d00c38@mail.gmail.com> <20070319183710.GA23499@strauss.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20070319183710.GA23499@strauss.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jesper Juhl , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fastboot@lists.osdl.org On 19/03/07, Bernhard Walle wrote: > * Jesper Juhl [2007-03-19 19:29]: > > > > > > -void > > > +int > > > register_percpu_irq (ia64_vector vec, struct irqaction *action) > > > { > > > > Each and every function example in Documentation/CodingStyle has the > > return type on the same line as the function name, so why not get > > these in-line while you are modifying them anyway? > > Because all other functions in that file are coded this way. I think > it looks better if you don't change the style in a particular file. > Am I wrong? > Consistency within the file certainly makes sense. -- Jesper Juhl Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html