From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Davide Libenzi Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 16:27:08 +0000 Subject: Re: Fw: epoll oops on 2.6.x Message-Id: List-Id: References: <40A3EAF6.1000902@cs.uwaterloo.ca> In-Reply-To: <40A3EAF6.1000902@cs.uwaterloo.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 17 May 2004, Louay Gammo wrote: > Davide Libenzi wrote: > > >On Fri, 14 May 2004, Louay Gammo wrote: > > > >>I did #1 and #2 and ran my original experiment. I did not get a panic but > >>I got 0 replies from the server. So I undid the #2 and I got a kernel > >>panic (included below). > >>So I am going to try to overload the server on loopback interface (I think > >>this is what you are saying) and I will let you know of the results. > >> > >>I am enclosing the kernel config just in case that might clue anyone to > >>a configuration problem. > >> > >> > > > >Can you try also to run the appended test program, like: > > > ># ./pipetest -n 2000 -a 3 -w 20000 > > > > > > > Ok, and I got this: > ~/pipetest> ./a.out -n 2000 -a 3 -w 20000 > 3.917762 > 3.868220 > 3.860521 > 3.855072 > 3.853522 > 3.853422 > 3.854822 > 3.853072 > 3.853972 > 3.854972 > 3.856022 > 3.855172 > 3.856572 > 3.860621 > 3.861171 > 3.855672 > > Does this help? This proves that it works fine with pipes. Can you try to put your server listening on localhost and load it thru localhost? - Davide