From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Lameter Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:57:40 +0000 Subject: Re: [Q] Why does dma_alloc_coherent() of ia64 GFP_DMA? Message-Id: List-Id: References: <20081110121123.F82A.E1E9C6FF@jp.fujitsu.com> <87d4h3pwhe.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <20081110190711.GG8483@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20081110190711.GG8483@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Robin Holt Cc: Andi Kleen , Yasunori Goto , "Luck, Tony" , FUJITA Tomonori , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel ML , Joerg Roedel On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Robin Holt wrote: > I am not sure what is be referred to here, but all of an Altix's memory is > DMA capable with the exception of the stuff covered by the MSPEC driver > (that is uncached memory). There are certainly all sort of special > requirements for doing transfers on Altix to eliminate memory ordering > problems, but nothing specific that I recall related to address ranges > and DMA. But then ZONE_DMA has nothing to do with memory being dmaable or not. ZONE_DMA is for legacy devices that cannot do DMA to all of memory. I vaguely remember having stuffed all the memory into ZONE_NORMAL at some point. ZONE_DMA vanishes for Altix configurations.