From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 06:55:24 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/12] ptrace: Document that wait_task_inactive can't fail Message-Id: List-Id: References: <87a6bv6dl6.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <20220505182645.497868-8-ebiederm@xmission.com> In-Reply-To: <20220505182645.497868-8-ebiederm@xmission.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, Oleg Nesterov , mingo@kernel.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, mgorman@suse.de, Will Deacon , tj@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Richard Weinberger , Anton Ivanov , Johannes Berg , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Chris Zankel , Max Filippov , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Kees Cook , Jann Horn , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org On 2022-05-05 13:26:41 [-0500], Eric W. Biederman wrote: > After ptrace_freeze_traced succeeds it is known that the the tracee the > has a __state value of __TASK_TRACED and that no __ptrace_unlink will > happen because the tracer is waiting for the tracee, and the tracee is > in ptrace_stop. Sebastian