From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [git pull] ia64 changes
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 23:01:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0909281555580.6996@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1FE6DD409037234FAB833C420AA843EC0122AEB1@orsmsx424.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Or did I miss something?
Never mind, it's all fine. It just depends on what you define "unlocked"
to be, and "old value matches high bits is unlocked" is obviously the more
attractive case than the one I was thinking of ("new value matches high
bits"), since it makes a zero initializer be unlocked.
And it's what x86 does too. I don't know why I expected the "new value
is the ticket" case.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-28 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-18 16:34 [git pull] ia64 changes Luck, Tony
2008-04-22 23:36 ` Luck, Tony
2008-04-24 23:51 ` Luck, Tony
2008-04-25 0:16 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-25 0:25 ` Luck, Tony
2008-04-25 0:41 ` [2.6 patch] ia64: let NUMA select SMP Adrian Bunk
2008-04-25 1:01 ` Luck, Tony
2008-04-25 12:50 ` Mike Travis
2008-04-29 23:36 ` [git pull] ia64 changes Luck, Tony
2008-05-01 22:57 ` Luck, Tony
2008-05-15 20:46 ` Luck, Tony
2008-05-28 19:52 ` Luck, Tony
2008-06-16 17:28 ` Luck, Tony
2008-06-24 21:49 ` Luck, Tony
2008-06-30 23:52 ` Luck, Tony
2008-07-17 20:31 ` Luck, Tony
2008-07-25 20:30 ` Luck, Tony
2008-08-06 18:32 ` Luck, Tony
2008-08-12 21:55 ` Luck, Tony
2008-08-18 23:46 ` Luck, Tony
2008-08-26 16:59 ` Luck, Tony
2008-09-10 21:17 ` Luck, Tony
2008-09-23 16:59 ` Luck, Tony
2008-09-30 16:18 ` Luck, Tony
2008-10-21 18:01 ` Luck, Tony
2008-11-05 0:43 ` Luck, Tony
2008-11-07 18:00 ` Luck, Tony
2008-11-20 22:47 ` Luck, Tony
2008-12-09 22:28 ` Luck, Tony
2009-01-15 19:45 ` Luck, Tony
2009-02-19 21:02 ` Luck, Tony
2009-02-25 22:44 ` Luck, Tony
2009-03-06 22:17 ` Luck, Tony
2009-03-27 17:46 ` Luck, Tony
2009-04-01 20:20 ` Luck, Tony
2009-04-08 22:33 ` Luck, Tony
2009-04-20 17:32 ` Luck, Tony
2009-05-05 22:42 ` Luck, Tony
2009-06-15 17:20 ` Luck, Tony
2009-07-17 18:11 ` Fenghua Yu
2009-08-11 23:40 ` Fenghua Yu
2009-09-02 17:28 ` Luck, Tony
2009-09-17 17:11 ` Luck, Tony
2009-09-26 19:57 ` Luck, Tony
2009-09-26 20:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-26 23:16 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-09-27 0:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-27 0:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-27 4:54 ` Luck, Tony
2009-09-27 5:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-27 5:20 ` Luck, Tony
2009-09-28 19:02 ` Boehm, Hans
2009-09-28 22:35 ` Luck, Tony
2009-09-28 22:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-28 23:01 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-09-28 23:01 ` Luck, Tony
2009-09-29 0:03 ` Rick Jones
2009-09-29 0:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-29 17:53 ` Luck, Tony
2009-09-29 18:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-30 0:54 ` Robin Holt
2009-09-30 1:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-30 1:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-30 2:46 ` Robin Holt
2009-09-30 2:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-30 18:00 ` Rick Jones
2009-11-02 18:07 ` Luck, Tony
2009-12-15 22:33 ` Luck, Tony
2010-01-08 17:20 ` Luck, Tony
2010-01-08 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-08 17:49 ` Luck, Tony
2010-01-08 19:24 ` Luck, Tony
2010-02-16 19:43 ` Luck, Tony
2010-02-24 17:32 ` Luck, Tony
2010-03-01 18:11 ` Luck, Tony
2010-05-18 17:11 ` Luck, Tony
2010-05-18 20:43 ` Robin Holt
2010-05-18 22:04 ` Luck, Tony
2010-07-01 15:22 ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-04 16:09 ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-14 4:04 ` Luck, Tony
2010-08-18 20:06 ` Luck, Tony
2010-09-13 18:33 ` Luck, Tony
2010-09-14 6:06 ` Petr Tesarik
2010-09-14 7:02 ` Petr Tesarik
2010-09-14 17:37 ` Luck, Tony
2010-09-14 20:38 ` Petr Tesarik
2010-09-14 20:57 ` Tony Luck
2010-09-16 15:57 ` Luck, Tony
2010-10-21 16:00 ` Luck, Tony
2010-10-21 21:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-01-10 18:01 ` Luck, Tony
2011-01-13 18:08 ` Luck, Tony
2011-01-13 23:10 ` Luck, Tony
2011-01-14 19:33 ` Luck, Tony
2011-03-24 16:29 ` Luck, Tony
2011-03-30 19:09 ` Luck, Tony
2011-05-31 20:20 ` Luck, Tony
2011-08-01 16:57 ` Luck, Tony
2011-11-02 21:06 ` Luck, Tony
2012-01-05 17:42 ` Luck, Tony
2012-03-23 17:23 ` [GIT PULL] " Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.01.0909281555580.6996@localhost.localdomain \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox