From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anshuman Khandual Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 03:58:07 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH V7] mm/debug: Add tests validating architecture page table helpers Message-Id: List-Id: References: <1571625739-29943-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Qian Cai Cc: Mark Rutland , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , James Hogan , Tetsuo Handa , Heiko Carstens , Michal Hocko , linux-mm@kvack.org, Dave Hansen , Paul Mackerras , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Michael Ellerman , x86@kernel.org, Russell King - ARM Linux , Matthew Wilcox , Steven Price , Jason Gunthorpe , Gerald Schaefer , linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Ingo Molnar , Kees Cook , Masahiro Yamada , Mark Brown , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Dan Williams , Vlastimil Babka , Christophe Leroy , Sri Krishna chowdary , Ard Biesheuvel , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Burton , Mike Rapoport , Vineet Gupta , Martin Schwidefsky , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" , Mike Kravetz On 10/24/2019 10:21 PM, Qian Cai wrote: > > >> On Oct 24, 2019, at 10:50 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> >> Changes in V7: >> >> - Memory allocation and free routines for mapped pages have been droped >> - Mapped pfns are derived from standard kernel text symbol per Matthew >> - Moved debug_vm_pgtaable() after page_alloc_init_late() per Michal and Qian >> - Updated the commit message per Michal >> - Updated W=1 GCC warning problem on x86 per Qian Cai > > It would be interesting to know if you actually tested out to see if the warning went away. As far I can tell, the GCC is quite stubborn there, so I am not going to insist. > Nothing specific. But just tested this with x86 defconfig with relevant configs which are required for this test. Not sure if it involved W=1. The problem is, there is no other or better way to have both the conditional checks in place while also reducing the chances this warning. IMHO both the conditional checks are required.