From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12472C05052 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 06:05:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1357898AbjHRGFD (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Aug 2023 02:05:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49652 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1357717AbjHRGEg (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Aug 2023 02:04:36 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-f46.google.com (mail-ej1-f46.google.com [209.85.218.46]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D11BE30E9; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 23:04:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-f46.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-99bdeae1d0aso64910666b.1; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 23:04:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692338673; x=1692943473; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:subject:from:references:cc:to :content-language:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=c2pHGRjubj9loM4rlnSBB8B0NBJEkF4e8IGQOJotz1E=; b=E49aNMoyhSGprnWWvLncKuA3lsjC0FoDWBxAVtUWUWIhHKFV1hjHqKPmr46nkZu5lx LUM6BfK3xUhdeUygbQK13fJSx8VcntzzfyCykwsCcG4JPS6nvy+zIZaEgCsbgIfop4zy TB0PbkvqUS9iY1ATZVmHAe7uSR49mWmKG7j+jfTAjewVH6L6UU2miHg1stnqPA9oAv0J mdzlCSmA4XTRK12kc6WSgYnETiNHftFEMetgcal9FHYa0eBo159wzr5kZqKdbZuPdvIu ptNvfEc78NDhZuBhi450X2XhDyl/pxW9Kriy3ZWlO+VzxGCWYj94lj7kkQaciJbh/2Tl WGGw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywo73eFHXI8fMjiPBbje8a6EhcVR9gDJCPFDDfV15US9muJ3AIM zeQqQy/eNdzDs85GJy9Y3gs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFyDqYKYpdUEqIE4zH8QDMlDuxP5lTa6oRNWYNxSC75jtLr7Y/tZRARUOxviPWlVJLzTV7YIQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3d32:b0:99e:f3b:2f7d with SMTP id l18-20020a1709063d3200b0099e0f3b2f7dmr1033218ejf.74.1692338672907; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 23:04:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.58] (185-219-167-24-static.vivo.cz. [185.219.167.24]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l3-20020a1709061c4300b009882e53a42csm754990ejg.81.2023.08.17.23.04.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Aug 2023 23:04:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 08:04:31 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.14.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Oleg Nesterov , Andrew Morton , "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Christian Brauner , Kees Cook , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20230817163708.GA8248@redhat.com> From: Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: [PATCH] kill do_each_thread() In-Reply-To: <20230817163708.GA8248@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org On 17. 08. 23, 18:37, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > Eric has pointed out that we still have 3 users of do_each_thread(). > Change them to use for_each_process_thread() and kill this helper. Is there any change in behavior? Why is for_each_process_thread() better than do_each_thread()? thanks, -- js suse labs