public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Mosberger-Tang" <dmosberger@gmail.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Unable to do IA64 stacktrace in early boot
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:03:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed5aea430612211403p63d0c28ds341a2d9cf9be5c62@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5478.1166673370@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com>

The libunwind-based unwinder uses it's own primitive allocator to
avoid such problems.  I posted a working patch a couple of months
back.

  --david

On 12/21/06, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 22:03 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > mutex-debug uses DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON() which indirectly calls
> > > dump_stack which the IA64 unwind code (arch/ia64/kernel/unwind.c)
> > calls
> > > kmalloc.  The lockdep tests are run before the slab caches have been
> > > allocated so cpu_cache_get is called with a NULL cachep, hence the
> > > oops.
> >
> > Yup.  I just debugged and fixed the same problem on parisc.  I didn't
> > think to check ia64; I checked to see what x86-64 did.  Unfortunately,
> > the ia64 unwind code seems a lot more subtle and more allocation-happy
> > than the parisc unwind code, so I'm not sure exactly how to fix ia64.
>
> yeah. calling kmalloc() within the unwinder is a no-no. What if the
> unwind happens while kmalloc() is crashing?
>
>         Ingo
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>


-- 
Mosberger Consulting LLC, http://www.mosberger-consulting.com/

      parent reply	other threads:[~2006-12-21 22:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-21  3:56 Unable to do IA64 stacktrace in early boot Keith Owens
2006-12-21  5:03 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-12-21 14:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-12-21 22:03 ` David Mosberger-Tang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ed5aea430612211403p63d0c28ds341a2d9cf9be5c62@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dmosberger@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox