From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:36:00 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ia64 sn xpc: Convert to use kthread API. Message-Id: List-Id: References: <1176969574439-git-send-email-ebiederm@xmission.com> <20070422203647.GC23015@infradead.org> <462CE8D5.8040300@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <462CE8D5.8040300@sgi.com> (Jes Sorensen's message of "Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:11:49 +0200") MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jes Sorensen Cc: Christoph Hellwig , ", containers@lists.osdl.org, Oleg Nesterov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tony Luck , rja@sgi.com, holt@sgi.com, dcn@sgi.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org Jes Sorensen writes: > > Like with the previous patch from Eric, I'm CC'ing the correct people > for this patch (forwarded it in a seperate email). CC'ing irrelevant > lists such as containers@ and not linux-ia64@ makes it somewhat > difficult to get proper reviews of these things. containers is actually relevant because everything not being converted to a kthread API is actually show stopper issue for the development of the pid namespace because of the usage of pids by kernel_thread, and the apparent impossibility to fix daemonize to sort this out. Now I do agree linux-ia64 is also relevant. > Russ/Dean/Robin - could one of you provide some feedback to this one > please. Eric