From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Broadfoot, KenX" Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 16:02:51 +0000 Subject: RE: [Linux-ia64] Kernel: which machine to choose? Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org I use: DIG-compliant Enable Itanium A-step Enable Itanium A1-step Enable AzusA hacks Enable IA64 Machine Check Abort SMP support ---------------------------------------------------------------- I am not using SoftSDV hacks ( strange I know ) I compile SMP even for the single proc box. It just "seems" more stable. My uptime is 4 days and 20 hours as of this writing. --ken > -----Original Message----- > From: G\351raud Krawezik [SMTP:gk@scali.no] > Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 12:15 AM > To: linux-ia64@linuxia64.com > Subject: [Linux-ia64] Kernel: which machine to choose? > > Hello, > > In order to use a kernel that support modules, I have downloaded > 2.4.0-test5. > There are four different kind of workstations available: Generic, > HP-simulator, SN1, DIG Compliant. > > HP-Sim crashes at the very beginning of the booting sequence > SN1 cannot compile > DIG compliant crashes while booting. > > I'm ok to make minor modifications by myself to haev this fixed, but could > someone tell me what version should I use? (from what I have seen, Generic > uses all the others, so it does not compile and some definitions seem to > be rather old...) > I'm using an SDV from intel. > > > Thanks by advance > > > Geraud > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-IA64 mailing list > Linux-IA64@linuxia64.org > http://lists.linuxia64.org/lists/listinfo/linux-ia64