Re: [Linux-ia64] switch_stack position

Keith Owens
2000-12-14T06:31:07Z

On Wed, 13 Dec 2000 22:21:49 -0800,
David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com> wrote:
>Sure, kdb should do it's job right, but kdb is certainly no reason to
>to hack the context switch code. Not for something that 99.9% of the
>users never even know existed.

One pointer in struct thread, one pointer in switch_stack, ~ 15
instructions (2-3 extra bundles) to set the pointers during
save_switch_stack, load_switch_stack and copy_thread. Is that too big
a change?