From: Cary Coutant <cary@cup.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] Incorrect unwind data in entry.S
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:54:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590693005063@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590678205870@msgid-missing>
>There is, it just has a strange name: ".restore sp" actually generates
>an epilogue directive and the (optional) second argument specifies the
>epilogue count.
Yes, it looks like Intel added it to their assembler, and I was unaware
of it until now.
>The kernel unwinder does _not_ assume that the stack size is fixed
>throughout the entire procedure. I didn't think the unwind specs
>forces that either, but if I'm missing something please let me know.
On reflection, I agree. I didn't anticipate nested prologues modifying a
fixed frame size, but I did not rule that out in the specs.
There still seems to be a problem with the unwind data not matching the
actual frame state:
> .prologue; // prologue 1
> .unwabi @svr4, 'i';
> .fframe 400+16+(0);
> // assorted .spillsp directives
> .body
> mov r16=r0
> .prologue // prologue 2
> movl r28\x1f;
> ;;
> .fframe 576;
> adds sp=-576,sp;
> mov b7=r28;
> // assorted .savesp and .spillsp directives
> br.cond.sptk.many save_switch_stack;
> 1:
> br.call.sptk.few rp=ia64_handle_unaligned
>.ret21: .body
> movl r28\x1f;
> ;;
> mov b7=r28;
> br.cond.sptk.many load_switch_stack;
> 1: .restore sp; // pop prologue 2
> .prologue; // prologue 3
> .unwabi @svr4, 'i';
> .fframe 400+16+(0);
> .spillsp rp, (8 + 16)+(0);
> .spillsp ar.pfs, (16 + 16)+(0);
> .spillsp ar.unat, (24 + 16)+(0);
> .spillsp ar.fpsr, (312 + 16)+(0);
> .spillsp pr, (64 + 16)+(0);;
> .body;
> adds spW6,sp
> br.cond.sptk.many rp
>.endp ia64_prepare_handle_unaligned
Perhaps there's something in the first set of "assorted .spillsp
directives," but I don't see where the outer 416-byte stack frame is
being allocated or deallocated. The code then allocates an additional 576
bytes, but prologue 2 describes the *total* frame size as 576. It then
pops prologue 2, but doesn't deallocate the 576 bytes until the beginning
of body region 3, leaving a narrow window where the unwinder will think
the frame size is 416 bytes.
There must be something I'm missing here.
-cary
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-17 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-21 3:42 [Linux-ia64] Incorrect unwind data in entry.S Keith Owens
2001-01-05 18:48 ` David Mosberger
2001-01-06 0:51 ` Keith Owens
2001-01-06 1:58 ` David Mosberger
2001-01-16 23:41 ` Cary Coutant
2001-01-17 1:34 ` David Mosberger
2001-01-17 18:54 ` Cary Coutant [this message]
2001-01-17 20:04 ` David Mosberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590693005063@msgid-missing \
--to=cary@cup.hp.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox