public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cary Coutant <cary@cup.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] Incorrect unwind data in entry.S
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:54:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590693005063@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590678205870@msgid-missing>

>There is, it just has a strange name: ".restore sp" actually generates
>an epilogue directive and the (optional) second argument specifies the
>epilogue count.

Yes, it looks like Intel added it to their assembler, and I was unaware 
of it until now.

>The kernel unwinder does _not_ assume that the stack size is fixed
>throughout the entire procedure.  I didn't think the unwind specs
>forces that either, but if I'm missing something please let me know.

On reflection, I agree. I didn't anticipate nested prologues modifying a 
fixed frame size, but I did not rule that out in the specs.

There still seems to be a problem with the unwind data not matching the 
actual frame state:

>        .prologue;			// prologue 1
>        .unwabi @svr4, 'i';
>        .fframe 400+16+(0);
>        // assorted .spillsp directives
>        .body
>        mov r16=r0
>        .prologue			// prologue 2
>        movl r28\x1f;
>        ;;
>        .fframe 576;
>        adds sp=-576,sp;
>        mov b7=r28;
>        // assorted .savesp and .spillsp directives
>        br.cond.sptk.many save_switch_stack;
>        1:
>        br.call.sptk.few rp=ia64_handle_unaligned
>.ret21: .body
>        movl r28\x1f;
>        ;;
>        mov b7=r28;
>        br.cond.sptk.many load_switch_stack;
>        1: .restore sp;			// pop prologue 2
>        .prologue;			// prologue 3
>        .unwabi @svr4, 'i';
>        .fframe 400+16+(0);
>        .spillsp rp, (8 + 16)+(0);
>        .spillsp ar.pfs, (16 + 16)+(0);
>        .spillsp ar.unat, (24 + 16)+(0);
>        .spillsp ar.fpsr, (312 + 16)+(0);
>        .spillsp pr, (64 + 16)+(0);;
>        .body;
>        adds spW6,sp
>        br.cond.sptk.many rp
>.endp ia64_prepare_handle_unaligned

Perhaps there's something in the first set of "assorted .spillsp 
directives," but I don't see where the outer 416-byte stack frame is 
being allocated or deallocated. The code then allocates an additional 576 
bytes, but prologue 2 describes the *total* frame size as 576. It then 
pops prologue 2, but doesn't deallocate the 576 bytes until the beginning 
of body region 3, leaving a narrow window where the unwinder will think 
the frame size is 416 bytes.

There must be something I'm missing here.

-cary


  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-01-17 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-12-21  3:42 [Linux-ia64] Incorrect unwind data in entry.S Keith Owens
2001-01-05 18:48 ` David Mosberger
2001-01-06  0:51 ` Keith Owens
2001-01-06  1:58 ` David Mosberger
2001-01-16 23:41 ` Cary Coutant
2001-01-17  1:34 ` David Mosberger
2001-01-17 18:54 ` Cary Coutant [this message]
2001-01-17 20:04 ` David Mosberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590693005063@msgid-missing \
    --to=cary@cup.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox