From: Michael Madore <mmadore@turbolinux.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] modutils 2.4.2 and USB
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:49:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590693005139@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590693005137@msgid-missing>
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 11:41:13AM -0800, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2001, Michael Madore <mmadore@turbolinux.com> wrote:
> > I have just built kernel 2.4.1 with the IA64 patch, and also the latest
> > (2.4.2) modutils. All of the USB options are compiled as modules, with the
> > exception of USB-Core, which is compiled statically. After installing
> > everything, running depmod -a yields:
> >
> > depmod: Module /lib/modules/2.4.1-010131-1smp/kernel/drivers/usb/acm.o has
> > an unknown version (2) usb_device table
> > It is likely that the kernel structure has changed, if so then
> > you probably need a new version of modutils to handle this kernel.
> > Check linux/Documentation/Changes.
> >
> > Is this a known problem?
>
> That is definately weird. Keith Owens wanted to add a version information
> to help fix a problem we ran into with 2.4.0.
>
> Right before 2.4.0 we had to modify the usb_device_id structure to add some
> extra information to make it work correctly. However, this didn't change
> the size of the structure (because of alignment reasons) and as a result
> it was difficult for modutils to tell the difference between the old style
> structure and the new style structure.
>
> Both Linus and I didn't want to add the version information in 2.4 and we
> just told him to drop the support for the old style structure since it was
> only found in development kernels.
>
> The code stayed in modutils it appears since it wouldn't get in the way
> of anything and it would be used in 2.5.
>
> But, the patch never went into the kernel and it shouldn't be finding any
> version information. Is there a __module_usb_device_ver symbol in acm.o?
Yes, acm.o has a symbol called __module_usb_device_ver. If I temporarily
remove acm.o, I get the same message for audio.o, so it isn't a problem just
with that module.
--
Mike Madore
Software Engineer
TurboLinux, Inc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-12 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-12 17:14 [Linux-ia64] modutils 2.4.2 and USB Michael Madore
2001-02-12 19:41 ` Johannes Erdfelt
2001-02-12 19:49 ` Michael Madore [this message]
2001-02-12 19:53 ` Johannes Erdfelt
2001-02-12 22:04 ` Keith Owens
2001-02-12 22:16 ` Michael Madore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590693005139@msgid-missing \
--to=mmadore@turbolinux.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox