From: David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [Linux-ia64] Re: Lockups on 2.4.1
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 06:09:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590693005219@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590693005190@msgid-missing>
OK, this makes sense: our systems have ptc.g enabled, which explains
why we haven't seen this problem. I made the change of using
smp_resend_flush_tlb() but also increased the timeout by a factor of
10.
Thanks,
--david
>>>>> On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:48:03 -0600 (CST), Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com> said:
>> > Anyway, I have ITPs connected to the IBM hardware and have
>> noticed that > when the lockup occurs, and we lose video, at
>> least one of the CPUs is > executing in flush_tlb_no_ptcg() or
>> handle_IPI(), in the 'do' loop where > TLB > entries are being
>> purged. What I have observed is that the end address and > the
>> start address are in completely different regions. Usually, the
>> start > address > is in region register 1 (address of
>> 0x2000XXXXXXXXXXXX) and the end address > is in region register 3
>> (address of 0x6000XXXXXXXXXXXX). I don't know if > this > is the
>> same problem I am seeing on the Lion, but I plan to connect and
>> ITP > and > a serial console (although we haven't been able to
>> get one to work yet on > the > Lion with BIOS 71) to see if the
>> symptoms are the same.
>>
>> FWIW, we have seen EXACTLY the same hang running here on our
>> system. The start/end addresses for the purge cross region
>> boundaries.
>>
>>
>> We are running a 2.4.0 kernel.
Jack> I found a problem that was causing the lockup described above
Jack> & I suspect this may responsible for some of the other hangs
Jack> various folks have seen.
Jack> There is code in flush_tlb_no_ptcg() that resends the IPI if
Jack> other cpus have not responded within a short time. If this
Jack> code get invoked, then it is possible for flush_cpu_count to
Jack> get corrupted. When that happens, a cpu can be executing in
Jack> handle_IPI() while flush_start/flush_end are changing. A cpu
Jack> can pick up a non-matching flush_start/flush_end. This leads
Jack> to hangs or lost TLB flushes.
Jack> To verify that this could cause the hang, I changed the
Jack> timeout in flush_tlb_no_ptcg() from 40000UL to 400UL. I hung
Jack> before getting to multiuser mode with flush_start/flush_end in
Jack> different regions.
Jack> Here is the patch I used. Note: this is against 2.4.0,
Jack> --- linux-trillian/arch/ia64/kernel/smp.c Thu Feb 22 14:35:28
Jack> 2001 +++ linux/arch/ia64/kernel/smp.c Thu Feb 22 14:19:46 2001
Jack> @@ -321,6 +321,16 @@ { send_IPI_allbutself(IPI_FLUSH_TLB); } +
Jack> +void +smp_resend_flush_tlb(void) +{ + /* + * Really need a
Jack> null IPI but since this rarely should happen & + * since this
Jack> code will go away, lets not add one. + */ +
Jack> send_IPI_allbutself(IPI_RESCHEDULE); +} #endif /*
Jack> !CONFIG_ITANIUM_PTCG */
Jack> /* --- linux-trillian/arch/ia64/mm/tlb.c Thu Feb 22 14:35:28
Jack> 2001 +++ linux/arch/ia64/mm/tlb.c Thu Feb 22 14:19:50 2001 @@
Jack> -59,6 +59,7 @@ flush_tlb_no_ptcg (unsigned long start,
Jack> unsigned long end, unsigned long nbits) { extern void
Jack> smp_send_flush_tlb (void); + extern void smp_resend_flush_tlb
Jack> (void); unsigned long saved_tpr = 0; unsigned long flags;
Jack> @@ -101,9 +102,8 @@ { unsigned long start = ia64_get_itc();
Jack> while (atomic_read(&flush_cpu_count) > 0) { - if
Jack> ((ia64_get_itc() - start) > 40000UL) { -
Jack> atomic_set(&flush_cpu_count, smp_num_cpus - 1); -
Jack> smp_send_flush_tlb(); + if ((ia64_get_itc() - start) > 400UL)
Jack> { + smp_resend_flush_tlb(); start = ia64_get_itc(); } }
Jack> -- Thanks
Jack> Jack Steiner (651-683-5302) (vnet 233-5302) steiner@sgi.com
Jack> _______________________________________________ Linux-IA64
Jack> mailing list Linux-IA64@linuxia64.org
Jack> http://lists.linuxia64.org/lists/listinfo/linux-ia64
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-28 6:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-22 20:48 Re: Re: [Linux-ia64] Re: Lockups on 2.4.1 Jack Steiner
2001-02-28 0:39 ` Mallick, Asit K
2001-02-28 6:09 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2001-02-28 17:05 ` Jack Steiner
2001-02-28 17:56 ` Mallick, Asit K
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590693005219@msgid-missing \
--to=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox