From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Linux-ia64] CONFIG_IA64_NEW_UNWIND
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 00:48:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590693005250@msgid-missing> (raw)
I'm running 2.4.0 with a couple of patches on 2-CPU Bigsur.
I have a problem where a cpu apparently hangs when a process
dumps core. The "hang" is caused when do_copy_regs() in
arch/ia64/kernel/process.c picks up random values for RSE
backing store addresses, and sits in this loop:
for (addr = pt->ar_bspstore; addr < ar_bsp; addr += 8)
if (ia64_peek(pt, current, addr, &val) = 0)
access_process_vm(current, addr, &val, sizeof(val),
1);
for a really long time (last time I caught it "addr" was 0x000003e2_47fbf540
and "ar_bsp" was 0x00006000_00000000 ... every call to ia64_peek() failed
with EIO ... but I calculated that it would have taken over six weeks to
complete the loop).
Looking back at where do_copy_regs() digs these values out of the
stack, I think that the problem lies in these lines:
unw_get_sp(info, &sp);
pt = (struct pt_regs *) (sp + 16);
We pick up a perfectly reasonable "sp" in the first line, but I
can't see why the code believes that that there would be a pt_regs
structure 16 bytes further up. I think that the frame looks like
this at this point
[high addresses]
frame for ia64_elf_core_copy_regs() <- "unw_get_sp(info, &sp)"
switch_stack structure (pushed by unw_init_running)
unw_frame_info structure (pushed by unw_init_running)
[low addresses]
The CONFIG_IA64_NEW_UNWIND=n version seems to make more
sense (it just uses the pt_user structure that was passed
to ia64_elf_core_copy_regs()).
A quick scan of 2.4.2 shows no apparent changes here.
Any clues?
-Tony Luck
next reply other threads:[~2001-03-07 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-07 0:48 Luck, Tony [this message]
2001-03-07 16:53 ` [Linux-ia64] CONFIG_IA64_NEW_UNWIND David Mosberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590693005250@msgid-missing \
--to=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox