From: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Linux-ia64] Replacements for local_irq_xxx()
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 08:55:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590693005562@msgid-missing> (raw)
Existing local_irq_xxx() routines clear psr.i which masks all
interrupts, including NMI. Then the only way to get the attention of a
cpu in a disabled spin loop is via INIT which is too drastic. How
about these alternatives which set cr.tpr.mmi instead, masking all
external interrupts except NMI?
This is not complete, I have to do the debugging versions plus check
out callers of ia64_{get,set}_tpr and resolve any conflicts. Before I
do any more work, is it worth continuing with this or do we live with
psr.i and accept that the only remedy for a cpu that is hung in a
disabled spin loop is to reboot the entire machine?
/* Nothing changes cr.tpr except local_irq_xxx() and they should always
* leave tpr in the same state that they found it, so there is no need
* to serialize access to tpr. If this is incorrect, uncomment the
* references to psr and the following srlz.d and add r15 to the clobbers.
*/
# define local_irq_save(x) \
do { \
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
";;\n\t" \
"# mov r15=psr;\n\t" \
"mov r17=(1 << 16);\n\t" \
"# ;; rsm psr.i;;\n\t" \
"mov %0=cr.tpr;;\n\t" \
"or r17=r17,%0;;\n\t" \
"mov cr.tpr=r17;;\n\t" \
"srlz.d;;\n\t" \
"# mov psr.l=r15;;\n\t" \
"# srlz.d;;\n\t" \
: "=r" (x) : : "r16", "r17"); \
} while (0)
# define local_irq_disable() \
do { \
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
";;\n\t" \
"# mov r15=psr;\n\t" \
"mov r17=(1 << 16);\n\t" \
"# ;; rsm psr.i;;\n\t" \
"mov r16=cr.tpr;;\n\t" \
"or r17=r17,r16;;\n\t" \
"mov cr.tpr=r17;;\n\t" \
"srlz.d;;\n\t" \
"# mov psr.l=r15;;\n\t" \
"# srlz.d;;\n\t" \
: : : "r16", "r17"); \
} while (0)
# define local_irq_restore(x) \
do { \
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
";;\n\t" \
"# mov r15=psr;\n\t" \
"# rsm psr.i;;\n\t" \
"mov cr.tpr=%0;;\n\t" \
"srlz.d;;\n\t" \
"# mov psr.l=r15;;\n\t" \
"# srlz.d;;\n\t" \
: : "r" (x) ); \
} while (0)
next reply other threads:[~2001-05-10 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-10 8:55 Keith Owens [this message]
2001-05-10 14:26 ` [Linux-ia64] Replacements for local_irq_xxx() David Mosberger
2001-05-10 15:39 ` David Mosberger
2001-05-14 12:52 ` Keith Owens
2001-05-14 17:22 ` DE-DINECHIN,CHRISTOPHE (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
2001-05-15 15:11 ` David Mosberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590693005562@msgid-missing \
--to=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox