public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: nomura@hpc.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] settings AR.k0 to ia64_iobase is wrong?
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 10:06:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590693005966@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590693005964@msgid-missing>

> This isn't right.  There is no way a VA->PA translation can set bit 63
> so address 0x80000ffffc000000 could only be generated in physical
> mode, which Linux (almost) never uses.  The address 0xffffc000000 is
> correct since Linux will access the memory range only through uncached
> space (region 6).

I didn't talk about VA-PA translation nor I/O memory range access by linux.
'mapping' was the wrong word, I'm afraid.

I mean ar.k0 seems to be used by SAL in physical mode and setting ar.k0 to
cached attribute is problematic.
I think setting bit63 to 1 (i.e. physical mode uncached) is better and safer
solution than just putting cached attribute physical address in ar.k0, unless
anyone or any part of code suffers from the bit.

Here is the updated patch which does not remove ia64_set_kr but set
uncached attribute bit on ia64_iobase in efi_get_iobase().
How about it?

--
NOMURA, Jun'ichi <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com, nomura@hpc.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
HPC Operating System Group, 1st Computers Software Division,
Computers Software Operations Unit, NEC Solutions.


Index: arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c
=================================RCS file: /home/cvsadm/cvsroot/linux/arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.7.6.1
diff -u -r1.1.1.7.6.1 efi.c
--- arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c	2001/07/27 06:54:28	1.1.1.7.6.1
+++ arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c	2001/07/31 07:37:49
@@ -473,7 +473,7 @@
 		if (md->type = EFI_MEMORY_MAPPED_IO_PORT_SPACE) {
 			/* paranoia attribute checking */
 			if (md->attribute = (EFI_MEMORY_UC | EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME))
-				return md->phys_addr;
+				return (1UL<<63) | md->phys_addr; /* Bit63=1: Uncached */
 		}
 	}
 	return 0;


  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-07-31 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-07-31  6:36 [Linux-ia64] settings AR.k0 to ia64_iobase is wrong? nomura
2001-07-31  8:17 ` David Mosberger
2001-07-31 10:06 ` nomura [this message]
2001-07-31 18:06 ` David Mosberger
2001-07-31 18:57 ` Dong Wei
2001-07-31 19:22 ` David Mosberger
2001-08-01 20:02 ` Mallick, Asit K

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590693005966@msgid-missing \
    --to=nomura@hpc.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox