public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] itc sync & clock_*
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 18:33:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590698805409@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590698805400@msgid-missing>

I sent mail to Asit last week about this. Copy is attached:


>> Asit -
>> 
>> The SGI platforms do not have a synchronized FSB clock across all nodes.
>> The result of this is ar.itc on different cpus may drift. There is code in the kernel
>> that assumes that all nodes stay synchronized. This obviously doesn't work on
>> our platform. (I expect other platforms will have similar problems).
>> 
>> We send David mods to handle this but he felt (& I agree) that SAL
>> should pass a flag that indicates whether the clocks are synchronized.
>> Then, the kernel can enable/disable the code that assumes clocks are
>> synchronized based on this flag - not a platform #ifdef.
>> 
>> Do you agree with this approach??
>> 
>> What do we need to do to get this flag added to the SAL spec.
>> 
>> My suggestion is (include/asm-ia64/sal.h):
>> 
>>        #define IA64_SAL_PLATFORM_FEATURE_BUS_LOCK              (1 << 0)
>>        #define IA64_SAL_PLATFORM_FEATURE_IRQ_REDIR_HINT        (1 << 1)
>>        #define IA64_SAL_PLATFORM_FEATURE_IPI_REDIR_HINT        (1 << 2)
>>        #define IA64_SAL_PLATFORM_FEATURE_ITC_UNSYNCHRONIZED    (1 << 3)        <<<< NEW
>>
>>        typedef struct ia64_sal_desc_platform_feature {
>>                u8 type;
>>                u8 feature_mask;
>>                u8 reserved1[14];
>>        } ia64_sal_desc_platform_feature_t;
>>

> 
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, David Mosberger wrote:
> 
> > The first thing to do is to get this into the firmware.  Linux needs a
> > way to detect when the ITCs are not driven off the same clock (i.e.,
> > when there is a chance for the ITCs to drift).  There also needs to be
> > a way for detecting when the clock frequencies are different, but I
> > believe the info provided by PAL/SAL is sufficient (my only worry are
> > rounding errors...).
> 
> Ok, we'll work on getting this pushed back, so at least the kernel can
> figure out what to do.  Regarding glibc though: we really don't want to
> have a different version just for our systems, so I'd like to come up with
> a generic solution.  Maybe an ia64 specific clock driver that glibc could
> map in to read synchronized clock info?  Is there a platform independent
> way of doing this?  I'll poke around glibc some more to see if any of the
> other arches deal with tis problem, but I'm sure there are people that are
> already familiar with these sorts of issues that might be able to help
> out.  Anyone?
> 
> Thanks a lot,
> Jesse
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-IA64 mailing list
> Linux-IA64@linuxia64.org
> http://lists.linuxia64.org/lists/listinfo/linux-ia64
> 


-- 
Thanks

Jack Steiner    (651-683-5302)   (vnet 233-5302)      steiner@sgi.com



  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-10-29 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-26 17:09 [Linux-ia64] itc sync & clock_* Jesse Barnes
2001-10-29 15:54 ` David Mosberger
2001-10-29 18:10 ` Jesse Barnes
2001-10-29 18:28 ` David Mosberger
2001-10-29 18:33 ` Jack Steiner [this message]
2001-10-29 18:52 ` David Mosberger
2001-10-29 21:27 ` David Mosberger
2001-10-31 19:41 ` Jesse Barnes
2001-11-06  1:03 ` David Mosberger
2001-11-06  1:03 ` Jesse Barnes
2001-11-09  1:31 ` Mallick, Asit K
2001-11-09  2:06 ` David Mosberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590698805409@msgid-missing \
    --to=steiner@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox