From: David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] patch to no longer use ia64's software mmu
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 21:47:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590698805588@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590698805585@msgid-missing>
Arjan> Hi, The patch below (against 2.4.16) makes the ia64 port no
Arjan> longer use the (VERY slow) software IO mmu but makes it use
Arjan> the same mechanism the x86 PAE port uses: it lets the higher
Arjan> layers take care of the proper bouncing of PCI-unreachable
Arjan> memory. The implemenation is pretty simple; instead of having
Arjan> a 4Gb GFP_DMA zone and a <rest of ram> GFP_KERNEL zone, the
Arjan> ia64 port now has a 4Gb GFP_DMA zone and a <rest of ram>
Arjan> GFP_HIGH zone. Since the ia64 cpu can address all of this
Arjan> memory directly, the kmap() and related functions are
Arjan> basically nops.
Arjan> The result: 100 mbit ethernet performance on a ia64 machine
Arjan> with 32Gb of ram increased more than 4x (from 20 mbit to 95
Arjan> mbit)....
Arjan> The only downside is that the current kernel will always
Arjan> bounce buffer disk IO even if the scsi card is 64 bit PCI
Arjan> capable; Jens Axboe's block highmem patch fixes that downside
Arjan> nicely though.
How soon will Jens' patch make it into the official tree? I think
that would be a pre-requisite before switching to a highmem based
implementation.
Another concern I have is that, fundamentally, I dislike the idea of
penalizing all IA-64 platforms due to one chipset that is, shall we
say, "lacking" (i.e., doesn't have an I/O TLB).
Could someone comment on whether the 870 will have I/O TLB support
(private mail is fine, if you don't feel comfortable sending mail to
all the lists...).
Thanks,
--david
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-03 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-03 21:00 [Linux-ia64] patch to no longer use ia64's software mmu Arjan van de Ven
2001-12-03 21:47 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2001-12-03 21:53 ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-12-04 18:14 ` David Mosberger
2001-12-04 18:19 ` Alan Cox
2001-12-04 19:55 ` David Mosberger
2001-12-04 19:56 ` David Mosberger
2001-12-04 19:56 ` David Mosberger
2001-12-04 20:22 ` David S. Miller
2001-12-04 20:32 ` David Mosberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590698805588@msgid-missing \
--to=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox