From: David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] PATCH: performance problems with swiotlb.c
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 21:55:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590698805590@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590698805583@msgid-missing>
>>>>> On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 12:12:07 -0800, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> said:
Tony> The basis of the fix is to partition the space reserved for
Tony> bounce buffers into smaller segments so that we place an upper
Tony> bound on the amount of work needed to coalesce blocks.
Looks good to me. I applied the patch,
Tony> In addition to the performace boost, this patch also fixes one
Tony> real bug that Dori found while testing. map_single() would
Tony> pick a "stride" based on the number of slots needed for the
Tony> request ... but if this stride is not a power of two, the "do
Tony> { ... } while (index != wrap);" loop can spin indefinitely. He
Tony> changed that to use a stride of 1 because he couldn't see the
Tony> benefit of the larger stride ... nor can I ... e.g. when
Tony> looking for 5 slots you might look at an allocation map that
Tony> looks like this:
Tony> 3 <- look here, 3<5 so skip down 5 slots 2 1 0 5 4 <-
Tony> now look here, missing the large enough block that began on
Tony> the previous slot.
I'm not sure either. I assume the stride was intended to reduce
searching overheads. Perhaps Asit or Goutham would know?
Thanks,
--david
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-03 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-03 20:12 [Linux-ia64] PATCH: performance problems with swiotlb.c Luck, Tony
2001-12-03 21:55 ` David Mosberger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590698805590@msgid-missing \
--to=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox