From: Chris McDermott <lcm@us.ibm.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] Hard "hangs" with 2.4.16
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 22:49:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590698805670@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590698805665@msgid-missing>
Jack,
Looks like my problem is something else. This patch didn't
correct the problem.
Thanks,
Chris
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 15:06 -0600, Jack Steiner wrote:
> >
> > Anybody else been seeing hangs with 2.4.16+ia64-1128.diff?
> >
> > I'm running on 4x Lions, some with B3's and some with C0's.
> > The BIOS revision is 83B. I have seen the hang on at least
> > 4 of the systems. This is a hard hang, no kb interrupts, so
> > kdb doesn't help. I don't have much to go on yet. The hangs
> > occur in random places, sometimes at various places during
> > boot and sometimes after the system has been up for a few
> > minutes. I put an ITP (American Arium) on one of the failing
> > systems and it didn't fail. Stayed up all night. I moved the
> > ITP to another failing system and was able to catch 1
> > occurrence of a "hang". I'm still trying to characterize this
> > hang to determine whether this is the same thing I am seeing
> > on the other systems or just a hardware (configuration) problem.
> > What I saw from the ITP was that all of the processors had
> > apparently reset (all of their IPs had returned to the reset
> > vector, 0x80000000FFFFFF90 (I did have the ITP set to break on
> > reset, but it didn't trigger). Not much else to go on, since I
> > couldn't even dump any useful processor context.
>
> We saw the same symptom & tracked it down to a bug in the
> write_unlock() macro. The result was a memory-ordering problem
> that caused the "unlock" of the tasklist_lock to be made
> globally visible before the "store's" to the link fields were
> visible. The result was a closed loop in the tasklist links.
>
>
> Try adding a barrier operation BEFORE the clear_bit.
>
> OLD
> #define write_unlock(x) ({clear_bit(31, (x)); mb();})
>
> NEW
> #define write_unlock(x) ({smp_mb__before_clear_bit(); clear_bit(31, (x));})
>
>
> This has been fixed in a later version of the IA64 patch.
>
>
>
> >
> > Anyone else seeing this sort of odd behavior with 2.4.16 on
> > Intel Lion SDVs?
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Chris McDermott
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-IA64 mailing list
> > Linux-IA64@linuxia64.org
> > http://lists.linuxia64.org/lists/listinfo/linux-ia64
> >
>
>
> --
> Thanks
>
> Jack Steiner (651-683-5302) (vnet 233-5302) steiner@sgi.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-10 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-10 20:46 [Linux-ia64] Hard "hangs" with 2.4.16 Chris McDermott
2001-12-10 21:06 ` Jack Steiner
2001-12-10 21:19 ` Andreas Schwab
2001-12-10 21:21 ` Chris McDermott
2001-12-10 22:49 ` Chris McDermott [this message]
2001-12-11 0:00 ` David Mosberger
2001-12-11 0:01 ` David Mosberger
2001-12-11 19:15 ` Chris McDermott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590698805670@msgid-missing \
--to=lcm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox