From: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] Re: Status on ioremap patch
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2002 11:55:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590698805753@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590698805186@msgid-missing>
On Sun, 06 Jan 2002 12:02:01 +0100,
Steffen Persvold <sp@scali.no> wrote:
>Keith Owens wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2002 16:01:29 +0100,
>> Steffen Persvold <sp@scali.no> wrote:
>> >--- linux-2.4.17/mm/memory.c.orig Fri Dec 21 18:42:05 2001
>> >+++ linux-2.4.17/mm/memory.c Sat Jan 5 13:13:26 2002
>> >@@ -791,6 +791,9 @@
>> > * maps a range of physical memory into the requested pages. the old
>> > * mappings are removed. any references to nonexistent pages results
>> > * in null mappings (currently treated as "copy-on-access")
>> >+ *
>> >+ * For physical (or I/O) memory mapped into the kernel virtual space,
>> >+ * the old mappings will not be removed.
>>
>> That comment worries me. If you have multiple mappings for the same
>> page then you may have problems on hardware that uses virtually indexed
>> caches. Two virtual addresses could map to the same physical page but
>> index to different cache lines, destroying cache coherency. How do you
>> prevent that?
>>
>
>Well, actually multiple mappings in kernel space is denied :
>
>+ if (address > VMALLOC_START && address < VMALLOC_END) {
>+ if (!pte_none(*pte)) {
>+ printk("remap_area_pte: page already exists\n");
>+ BUG();
>+ }
>+ set_pte(pte, mk_pte_phys(phys_addr, prot));
>+ } else {
>+ struct page *page;
>+ pte_t oldpage;
>+ oldpage = ptep_get_and_clear(pte);
>+
>+ page = virt_to_page(__va(phys_addr));
>+ if ((!VALID_PAGE(page)) || PageReserved(page))
>+ set_pte(pte, mk_pte_phys(phys_addr, prot));
>+ forget_pte(oldpage);
>+ }
What about one mapping in kernel space and one in user space, or two
mappings in user space? As long as you have more than one mapping to
the same physical page you must handle virtual cache aliasing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-06 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-14 23:14 [Linux-ia64] Re: Status on ioremap patch David Mosberger
2001-09-15 12:36 ` Steffen Persvold
2001-09-28 12:39 ` Jes Sorensen
2002-01-05 15:01 ` Steffen Persvold
2002-01-05 23:30 ` Keith Owens
2002-01-06 11:02 ` Steffen Persvold
2002-01-06 11:55 ` Keith Owens [this message]
2002-01-06 14:27 ` Steffen Persvold
2002-01-09 20:01 ` Steffen Persvold
2002-01-10 3:01 ` David Mosberger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-03 15:12 Hugo Kohmann
2004-03-03 22:58 ` David Mosberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590698805753@msgid-missing \
--to=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox