Jes Sorensen wrote:

>>>>>>"David" == David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com> writes:
>>>>>>
>
>David> I think one point that hasn't been made so far is that we
>David> actively discourage supporting an ILP32 data model for IA-64
>David> Linux to avoid splitting ia64 linux into two different worlds
>David> (32-bit and 64-bit world).  If we supported ILP32, it's very
>David> likely that some ISVs will decide to provide *only* 32-bit
>David> libraries, which could in turn force other ISVs to stay with
>David> 32-bit just because they couldn't get the pre-requisite 64-bit
>David> libraries.  My understanding is that IRIX suffered from this
>David> effect.
>
>Very good point, and even if we went down that road one could argue we
>should only go for IP32 with long's being 64 bit.
>

I see the drawback...  :-D  But maybe Linux provides enough open-source 
alternatives to existing ISV libraries to limit the number of ISV's 
impacted by this kind of forced limitation...?

BTW, do you know what is the choice on Linux/ppc64 vs. the previous 
Linux/ppc implementation on the same topic(data-model sizes)?

>Just say no ;)
>

FiX

-- 
Francois-Xavier "FiX" KOWALSKI     /_ __    Tel:+33 (0)4 76 14 63 27
Telecom Infrastructure Division   / //_/    Telnet: 779-6327
SigTech eXpert                      /       http://www.hp.com/go/opencall
                               i n v e n t