From: "Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [Linux-ia64] Patch to fix latest kernels issue with FW83
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 22:57:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590698805937@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590698805927@msgid-missing>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bjorn_helgaas@hp.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 8:08 AM
> To: Mallick, Asit K; linux-ia64@linuxia64.org
> Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] Patch to fix latest kernels issue with FW83
>
>
> On Thursday 24 January 2002 12:46 pm, Mallick, Asit K wrote:
> > We have root caused the stability problem with latest
> kernels and FW83
> > (LION platform). The following patch (based on 2.4.17) fixes the
> > problem.
> ...
> > - "ld4.bias r2 = [%0]\n" \
> > + "ld4 r2 = [%0]\n" \
>
> Can you elaborate on this a bit? All I know about ld.bias is
> the statement
> in section 4.4.6.1 of Vol 1 that
>
> [ld.bias] is a hint to the implementation to acquire exclusive
> ownership of the line containing the addressed data. The bias
> hint does not affect program functionality and may be ignored
> by the implementation.
This is correcnt.
>
> I can believe the patch is a performance optimization (my
> intuition is that
> when the holder writes the lock to release it, the waiter will merely
> invalidate its shared line, where it previously had to invalidate and
> copyout its exclusive line), but I don't see how this should improve
> stability. What am I missing?
FW83 does not have a workaround for a chipset issue (chipset SAC errata#2 in
460GX specification update) that could cause a livelock with ld.bias loops
and no modification. The later version of the FWs have the workaround and
will not see this problem.
Thanks,
Asit
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-25 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-24 19:46 [Linux-ia64] Patch to fix latest kernels issue with FW83 Mallick, Asit K
2002-01-25 15:11 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-01-25 16:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2002-01-25 17:29 ` Hall, Jenna S
2002-01-25 22:57 ` Mallick, Asit K [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590698805937@msgid-missing \
--to=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox