From: Cary Coutant <cary@cup.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Re: [Linux-ia64] IA64 Link Relocation operators ]
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 18:45:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590698806009@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590698806002@msgid-missing>
> Yes that is about the only documentation that i have been able to find about
>link relocations. I needed some more details like how they are
>implemented etc.
This might help -- it's the original text of the proposal I submitted to
the psABI group. This proposal didn't include the assembler pseudo-ops;
they came about later.
-cary
Subject: Link-time optimization of indirect addressing (Issue #66?)
Date: 5/21/99 8:24 PM
To: IA-64 ABI Group, ia64-abi@unix-os.sc.intel.com
One useful and simple optimization that can be done at link time is the
in situ conversion of an indirect load or store sequence into a direct
load or store sequence, when the linker can determine that a particular
variable is "protected" and within addl addressing range of gp. While
this doesn't remove any instructions (I don't want to get into the
business of rewriting IA-64 code in the linker), it does replace a load
with an effective no-op.
What we want to change is the sequence on the left to that on the right,
without regard to any intervening instructions:
addl t1=@ltoff(var),gp => addl t1=@gprel(var),gp
ld8 t2=[t1] => mov t2=[t1]
ld8 loc0=[t2] => ld8 loc0=[t2]
Notice that we don't have to worry about whether the temporaries t1 and
t2 are live beyond their original ranges.
This transformation can be particularly easy with two new relocations:
LTOFF22X 0x86
LDXMOV 0x87
The LTOFF22X relocation is used on the addl instruction in place of the
normal LTOFF22 relocation. It has exactly the same semantics as LTOFF22
unless the linker determines that the symbol can be addressed directly.
If the symbol can be addressed directly, the linker transforms this into
a GPREL22 relocation.
The LDXMOV relocation is used on the first ld8 instruction, where no
relocation would ordinarily be seen. Its symbol and addend fields must
match exactly those of the corresponding LTOFF22X relocation. If the
linker determines that the symbol can be addressed directly, it rewrites
the ld8 as a mov. This can be done easily by masking out all but the qp,
r1, and r3 fields of the instruction, then or'ing in the bit pattern
0x8000000000.
Of course, any implementation may treat LTOFF22X as a synonym of LTOFF22,
and ignore LDXMOV completely.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-06 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-06 15:03 [Re: [Linux-ia64] IA64 Link Relocation operators ] Harish Babu
2002-02-06 15:07 ` Harish Babu
2002-02-06 15:49 ` Saxena, Sunil
2002-02-06 18:45 ` Cary Coutant [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590698806009@msgid-missing \
--to=cary@cup.hp.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox