public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Hesterberg <jh@sgi.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Linux-ia64] driver location for platform-specific drivers
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:17:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590698806031@msgid-missing> (raw)

Linus & Marcelo,

For SGI's upcoming Linux platform (nicknamed Scalable Node, or SN),
we have some platform specific device drivers.  Where should these go?
I see several precedents in the current kernels.

    1) Integrate in drivers/*.
       Integrate SN drivers into appropriate directories.
       Put them directly in char, net, misc, etc., as appropriate.

    2) Company (sgi) directory.
       There is already an sgi directory, strangely enough.
       I *think* this was meant to be a platform directory for the
       discontinued SGI 320/540 Visual Workstations.  However, maybe
       it was intended to be a new precedent of company specific
       directories.  In this case, we'd probably create a platform
       directory under the company directory, so there would likely
       be drivers/sgi/sn (some of our SN drivers are here today in
       our internal development tree).  However, there is no other
       precedent for "company" subdirectories under drivers.  Apple
       didn't do it.  IBM didn't do it.  HP hasn't done it.  Was the
       drivers/sgi directory really intended to start a new
       precedent of company specific directories under drivers?

    3) New platform directory.
       Create a platform directory for SN, probably drivers/sn.
       There is precedence for this with the drivers/macintosh
       and drivers/s390.  Also, as noted, the SGI Visual Workstation
       drivers are in drivers/sgi.  In this case, it might also make
       sense to rename drivers/sgi to drivers/visws to indicate
       these are drivers for the Visual Workstation platform, and
       not generic SGI drivers.

    4) New architecture directory.
       Another suggestion is to create an architecture directory,
       in this case drivers/ia64/{char,net,etc.}/.

I'm happy with whatever you'll accept.  To give you something to
either agree with or shoot down, I'll suggest #3.  SGI's Scalable
Node product will be different enough, with enough platform specific
drivers, that it justifies it's own subdirectory, and that this
should be called drivers/sn.

John Hesterberg
jh@sgi.com


                 reply	other threads:[~2002-02-11 19:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590698806031@msgid-missing \
    --to=jh@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox