From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@sgi.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] O(1) scheduler K3+ for IA64
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 18:37:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590701905214@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590701905201@msgid-missing>
I applied the fix below, but still get hangs at boot sometimes.
Here's the output with one of the smpboot debug switches turned on,
hope it helps.
Thanks,
Jesse
CPU13: CPU has booted.
Sending wakeup vector 18 to AP 0xe/0x302.
Waiting on callin_map ...start_secondary: starting CPU 0x302
CPU 14: mapping PAL code [0x0-0x100000) into
[0xe000000000000000-0xe000000004000
000)
CPU 14: 51 virtual and 44 physical address bits
CPU 13 is set to go.
CPU 14: base freq\x133.017MHz, ITC ratio\x11/2, ITC freqs1.598MHz
C PROM ERROR: Unimplemented SAL call (sal_get_state_info)
ia64_log_get: Failed to retrieve SAL error record type 0
Unexpected irq vector 0xe12 on CPU 14!
Calibrating delay loop... 728.32 BogoMIPSD PROM RTS_TRACE:
(sal_freq_base)
Stack on CPU 14 at about e00000004ff6fe60I'm alive and well
CPU14: CPU has booted.
Sending wakeup vector 18 to AP 0xf/0x303.
Waiting on callin_map ...start_secondary: starting CPU 0x303
CPU 15: mapping PAL code [0x0-0x100000) into
[0xe000000000000000-0xe000000004000
000)
CPU 15: 51 virtual and 44 physical address bits
CPU 14 is set to go.
CPU 15: base freq\x133.017MHz, ITC ratio\x11/2, ITC freqs1.598MHz
D PROM ERROR: Unimplemented SAL call (sal_get_state_info)
ia64_log_get: Failed to retrieve SAL error record type 0
Unexpected irq vector 0xf12 on CPU 15!
Calibrating delay loop... 728.32 BogoMIPS
Stack on CPU 15 at about e00000004ff67e60
CPU15: CPU has booted.
Before bogomips.
Total of 16 processors activated (11650.12 BogoMIPS).
Setting commenced=1, go go go
CPU 3 is starting idle.
CPU 2 is starting idle.
CPU 4 is starting idle.
CPU 5 is starting idle.
CPU 7 is starting idle.
CPU 6 is starting idle.
CPU 9 is starting idle.
CPU 8 is starting idle.
CPU 12 is starting idle.
CPU 13 is starting idle.
CPU 14 is starting idle.
CPU 11 is starting idle.
CPU 10 is starting idle.
migration_task on cpu=0 mask=1
migration_task on cpu=1 mask=2
migration_task on cpu=2 mask=4
CPU 15 is set to go.
CPU 15 is starting idle.
migration_task on cpu\x14 mask@00
migration_task on cpu\x13 mask 00
migration_task on cpu\x12 mask\x1000
migration_task on cpu=8 mask\x100
migration_task on cpu=6 mask@
migration_task on cpu=7 mask€
migration_task on cpu=9 mask 0
migration_task on cpu=4 mask\x10
migration_task on cpu=5 mask
migration_task on cpu\x11 mask€0
migration_task on cpu\x10 mask@0
migration_task on cpu\x15 mask€00
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 12:41:40PM +0100, Erich Focht wrote:
> Hi Jesse,
>
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>
> > Hey Erich, I've been testing out your latest K3+ patch (along with
> > yours and Mike's NUMA scheduler changes) and found that it seems less
> > stable than the old version that used locking for the tlb flush stuff.
> > I think there's a deadlock somewhere in the new code since
> > 2.4.17 + kdb + ia64 + Ingo K3 + old K3+: rock solid
> > 2.4.17 + kdb + ia64 + Ingo K3 + new K3+: sometimes hangs at boot,
>
> please find attached a fix the should help for the K3+ scheduler. I had
> this fixed in the NUMA patch I've sent out...
>
> The NUMA patch can have similar problems, there I needed to eliminate the
> idle checks in scan_pools().
>
> Best regards,
> Erich
>
> --- 2.4.17-ia64-kdbv2.1-K3+/kernel/sched.c.~1~ Mon Mar 4 11:39:18 2002
> +++ 2.4.17-ia64-kdbv2.1-K3+/kernel/sched.c Mon Mar 4 11:54:01 2002
> @@ -1539,7 +1539,8 @@
>
> for (;;) {
> if (test_and_clear_bit(smp_processor_id(), &migration_mask))
> - current->cpus_allowed = 1 << smp_processor_id();
> + printk("migration_task on cpu=%d mask=%lx\n",
> + cpu(),current->cpus_allowed);
> if (current->need_resched)
> schedule();
> if (!migration_mask)
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-04 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-28 18:44 [Linux-ia64] O(1) scheduler K3+ for IA64 Erich Focht
2002-03-01 23:06 ` Jesse Barnes
2002-03-02 0:22 ` Jesse Barnes
2002-03-04 11:41 ` Erich Focht
2002-03-04 18:37 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2002-03-05 17:37 ` Erich Focht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590701905214@msgid-missing \
--to=jbarnes@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox