From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Hirst Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 11:57:00 +0000 Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] gcc/binutils bug building parted? Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 09:01:01PM -0800, David Mosberger wrote: > That is pretty weird. Does the problem occur with gcc3 as well? It might > also help to look at the assembly code. Yes, it does happen with gcc 3.0.4 as well, if I mess with a string length in the .c source, to provoke it. The problem seems to be related to the packed attribute on the struct definition: typedef struct { uint32_t time_low; uint16_t time_mid; uint16_t time_hi_and_version; uint8_t clock_seq_hi_and_reserved; uint8_t clock_seq_low; uint8_t node[6]; } __attribute__ ((packed)) efi_guid_t; When that is used thus: #define PARTITION_BASIC_DATA_GUID \ ((efi_guid_t) { 0xEBD0A0A2, 0xB9E5, 0x4433, 0x87, 0xC0, { 0x68, 0xB6, 0xB7, 0x26, 0x99, 0xC7 }}) gpt_part_data->pte->PartitionTypeGuid PARTITION_BASIC_DATA_GUID; it generates assembler like this: .section .rodata .LC26: data4 3956318370 data2 47589 data2 17459 data1 135 data1 192 data1 104 data1 182 data1 183 data1 38 data1 153 data1 199 ... ... addl r40 = @ltoff(.LC26), gp ... Note there is no .align before that .LC26 label. The last byte used in .rodata happens to be 0xe6, so r40 gets loaded with .rodata+0xe7, as can be seen if I disassemble the .o file: 1360: 09 40 01 02 00 24 [MMI] addl r40=0,r1 1360: LTOFF22 .rodata+0xe7 That is all correct, I guess, but when I come to dump the .rodata section I see d0: 30 39 3a 33 36 3a 34 31 20 62 75 79 74 65 6e 68 09:36:41 buytenh e0: 20 45 78 70 20 24 00 00 a2 a0 d0 eb e5 b9 33 44 Exp $........3D f0: 87 c0 68 b6 b7 26 99 c7 ..h..&.. where you can see that the LC26 data is actually stored at .rodata+0xe8, not +0xe7. If I remove the __attribute__ ((packed)), then the assembler has a .align 4 before .LC26, and things are ok. It seems odd that strings in .rodata are all .align 8, while this struct, even when not packed, is only .align 4. It looks like the code generation assumes no .align to mean .align 1, while the .rodata generation assumes no .align to mean .align 4. Is that possible? Given that that struct is arranged with largest types first (as dictated by the guid definition, of course), is there any reason to have a packed attribute on it anyway? The attached program will generate the problem for you; "ding" is 5 bytes long so the generated code thinks the guid is at .rodata+5, while .rodata is actually generated with the guid at .rodata+8. Richard ---------------------------------- cut ------------------------------- typedef unsigned int uint32_t; typedef unsigned short uint16_t; typedef unsigned char uint8_t; typedef struct { uint32_t time_low; uint16_t time_mid; uint16_t time_hi_and_version; uint8_t clock_seq_hi_and_reserved; uint8_t clock_seq_low; uint8_t node[6]; } __attribute__ ((packed)) efi_guid_t; #define PARTITION_BASIC_DATA_GUID \ ((efi_guid_t) { 0xEBD0A0A2, 0xB9E5, 0x4433, 0x87, 0xC0, { 0x68, 0xB6, 0xB7, 0x26, 0x99, 0xC7 }}) void bar (char **p) { *p = "ding"; } void foo (efi_guid_t *g) { *g = PARTITION_BASIC_DATA_GUID; } int main (int argc, char **argv) { efi_guid_t g; char *p; bar(&p); foo(&g); return 0; } ---------------------------------- cut -------------------------------