From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] epilogue count exceeds number of nested prologues
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 05:00:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590701905423@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590701905403@msgid-missing>
>>>>> On Mon, 8 Apr 2002 22:09:53 -0700, Randolph Chung <tausq@debian.org> said:
Randolph> indeed, mozilla's configure.in says:
Randolph> if test "$LIBFFI_FOUND" = "yes"; then
Randolph> AC_MSG_CHECKING("for FFI_STATIC_CLOSURE in libffi")
Randolph> AC_TRY_COMPILE([#include "ffi.h"],
Randolph> [ FFI_STATIC_CLOSURE(foo, bar, baz, quux); ],
Randolph> [ LIBFFI_HAS_STATIC_CLOSURE=yes ])
Randolph> AC_MSG_RESULT("$result")
Randolph> fi
Randolph> which generates (from config.log):
Randolph> configure:13494: checking for FFI_STATIC_CLOSURE in libffi
Randolph> configure:13503: gcc-3.0 -c -I/home/randolph/debian/mozilla-0.9.9/build-tree/libffi-install/include -fshort-wchar -pthread -pipe -I/usr/X11R6/include conftest.c 1>&5
Randolph> {standard input}: Assembler messages:
Randolph> {standard input}:40: Error: Epilogue count of 4294967296 exceeds number of nested prologues (0)
Randolph> configure: failed program was:
Randolph> #line 13496 "configure"
Randolph> #include "confdefs.h"
Randolph> #include "ffi.h"
Randolph> int main() {
Randolph> FFI_STATIC_CLOSURE(foo, bar, baz, quux);
Randolph> ; return 0; }
For some reason, I don't see this in my configure.in. Was this added
by the Debian patch? In principle, it's a good idea to check for this
macro, but I the check needs to be different. To get it to compile,
FFI_STATIC_CLOSURE() would have to be declared at the outermost level.
Alternatively, perhaps you can just grep for this macro in ffi.h (I
think autoconf has support for doing this).
--david
PS: I dropped binutils from the cc list, as it's clearly not a binutils
issue.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-09 5:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-08 0:17 [Linux-ia64] epilogue count exceeds number of nested prologues Randolph Chung
2002-04-08 15:52 ` David Mosberger
2002-04-08 17:25 ` David Mosberger
2002-04-09 4:46 ` David Mosberger
2002-04-09 5:00 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2002-04-09 5:09 ` Randolph Chung
2002-04-09 5:23 ` Randolph Chung
2002-04-09 5:56 ` Jeff Licquia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590701905423@msgid-missing \
--to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox