From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 03:50:35 +0000 Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] new kernel patch (relative to 2.5.8-pre3) Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 07:15:47PM -0700, David Mosberger wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:04:14 -0700, Greg KH said: > > Greg> I think the patch on kernel.org for usb-uhci.c is not needed > Greg> anymore. Do you want me to send you a changeset against your > Greg> ia64.bkbits.net tree? > > There is no change for usb-uhci.c. There was one in the past, which > resulted in a conflict when pulling from Linus' 2.5.8-pre3 tree. > During the merge, I opted to use Linus' version. I don't know why > it's showing up in the changeset. There is a uhci.c (sorry, meant to say this, instead of usb-uhci.c) change in the patch you just posted on kernel.org. Your diffstat says there is also a change to usb-ohci.c, but that doesn't show up in your patch. And it looks like the ia64.bkbits.net/to-linus-2.5 doesn't contain all of the changes you have listed in the patch you just posted, right? Is there a bk tree somewhere I can clone that matches up with your working tree right now? I'd like to get that usb patch out of there :) thanks, greg k-h