From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Mosberger Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 05:31:04 +0000 Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] new kernel patch (relative to 2.5.8-pre3) Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org >>>>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 20:50:35 -0700, Greg KH said: Greg> There is a uhci.c (sorry, meant to say this, instead of Greg> usb-uhci.c) change in the patch you just posted on kernel.org. Greg> Your diffstat says there is also a change to usb-ohci.c, but Greg> that doesn't show up in your patch. This is really bugging you, eh? ;-) Greg> And it looks like the ia64.bkbits.net/to-linus-2.5 doesn't Greg> contain all of the changes you have listed in the patch you Greg> just posted, right? Like I said: it's simply what the script produced. Greg> Is there a bk tree somewhere I can clone that matches up with Greg> your working tree right now? I'd like to get that usb patch Greg> out of there :) No, the lia64 patch is a union of about a dozen bk trees. I'm chipping away one tree after another, as Linus merges stuff, until at the end only to-linus-2.5 is left. I did make the union tree available in the past, but it was a pain to maintain (it's a throwaway tree and bkbits.net isn't well setup to handle that, as far as I can tell). Anyhow, I modified the tree containing the temporary hacks to omit the uhci.c change. I'm not sure whether the comment will be gone (I suspect not, given bk's tendency never to forget anything), but the patch should be correct. --david