From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 04:43:56 +0000 Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] new kernel patch (relative to 2.5.8-pre3) Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:31:04PM -0700, David Mosberger wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 20:50:35 -0700, Greg KH said: > > Greg> There is a uhci.c (sorry, meant to say this, instead of > Greg> usb-uhci.c) change in the patch you just posted on kernel.org. > Greg> Your diffstat says there is also a change to usb-ohci.c, but > Greg> that doesn't show up in your patch. > > This is really bugging you, eh? ;-) Heh, yeah it is. As the usb maintainer, I like it if people who have patches to the subsystem let me know about it :) > Greg> Is there a bk tree somewhere I can clone that matches up with > Greg> your working tree right now? I'd like to get that usb patch > Greg> out of there :) > > No, the lia64 patch is a union of about a dozen bk trees. I'm > chipping away one tree after another, as Linus merges stuff, until at > the end only to-linus-2.5 is left. I did make the union tree > available in the past, but it was a pain to maintain (it's a throwaway > tree and bkbits.net isn't well setup to handle that, as far as I can > tell). > > Anyhow, I modified the tree containing the temporary hacks to omit the > uhci.c change. I'm not sure whether the comment will be gone (I > suspect not, given bk's tendency never to forget anything), but the > patch should be correct. Thanks for doing this. greg k-h