public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Wilson <wilson@redhat.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] Back to the future: which gcc for kernel 2.4.18 ?
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 17:04:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590701905678@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590701905641@msgid-missing>

>We are using a RedHat 7.2 distibution. gcc3-3.0.1-3 RPM is part of the
>distibution and provides a /usr/bin/gcc3 binary distinct from the
>/usr/bin/gcc binary provided by gcc-2.96-101 RPM.

Seems to be some inconsistencies in the packaging then.  A 3.0.1 RPM shouldn't
comtain a 3.0.2 compiler.  The RHL 7.2/IA-64 system I am using has a gcc3
compiler that identifies itself as 3.0.4-1.  I don't know what RPM that came
from as rpm isn't being cooperative.  In any case, gcc 3.0 really isn't
very interesting.

>http://ftp.dulug.duke.edu/pub/redhat/linux/rawhide/ia64/RedHat/RPMS/gcc-3.1-6.ia64.rpm 
>and tried to install with rpm command. I had to remove a lot of RPMs
>and got stuck with the message:
>        rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 is needed by gcc-3.1-6

No idea.  I've never used anything from Rawhide.  I know that they sometimes
change rpm in non-backwards compatible ways which make it difficult to use
stuff from rawhide, but that doesn't really help you.

>Is there a clean way to do that for an unexperimented gcc user, in
>particular, can we have a gcc3.1 like installation that allows keeping 
>the gcc2.96 ?

I don't know much about how the RPM stuff works.  That is the OS side of
Red Hat, not the tools side of Red Hat.  I'd suggest trying something like
        ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/releases/gcc-3.1/gcc-3.1.tar.bz2
It shouldn't be too hard to build and install this.  If this doesn't build
the kernel OK, it will be fixed.

Jim


  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-06-14 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-06-05 15:28 [Linux-ia64] Back to the future: which gcc for kernel 2.4.18 ? Xavier Bru
2002-06-05 17:34 ` David Mosberger
2002-06-13 23:40 ` Jim Wilson
2002-06-14 11:41 ` Xavier Bru
2002-06-14 17:04 ` Jim Wilson [this message]
2002-06-14 21:17 ` [Linux-ia64] Back to the future: which gcc for kernel 2.4.18 Wichmann, Mats D

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590701905678@msgid-missing \
    --to=wilson@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox