From: "Olivier, JeffreyX" <jeffreyx.olivier@intel.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [Linux-ia64] mmap and malloc questions on IA-64 linux
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 15:40:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590701905906@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590701905877@msgid-missing>
>Yes, normally there is one entry per mapped file. If you use munmap()
>and mmap() a lot, the merging-logic in the kernel may not be able to
>keep up and then you'd get fragmented maps, even when they could be
>merged in theory. However, from what you have described so far, I do
>not think this is something you'd be running into. So something seems
>strange here.
Your suggestion that munmap() might fragment the map reminded me of
something else. Upon receiving a write notice from another node for a page,
our system uses mprotect on the page so that we can't write to it without
causing a segmentation fault. Since we do this on a per-page basis, this is
likely the cause of the multiple mappings and since we are doing this over
such a large address space, it is likely that the linux default of 65536
memory maps is the problem. Does that seem reasonable?
I can see two possible solutions:
1. Develop an algorithm to efficiently combine memory mappings with the
same protections. This would be fairly straight forward for my program but
for more sporadic memory accesses, it might not work very well.
2. Change the default maximum number of mappings. I noticed a
/proc/sys/vm/max_map_count variable. Can this be increased safely?
Thanks for the help!
-Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-05 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-01 16:47 [Linux-ia64] mmap and malloc questions on IA-64 linux Olivier, JeffreyX
2002-08-01 18:09 ` David Mosberger
2002-08-02 15:25 ` Olivier, JeffreyX
2002-08-02 21:08 ` David Mosberger
2002-08-05 15:40 ` Olivier, JeffreyX [this message]
2002-08-05 20:31 ` David Mosberger
2002-08-05 21:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590701905906@msgid-missing \
--to=jeffreyx.olivier@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox