public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] utime emulation
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 20:40:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590701905920@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590701905917@msgid-missing>

"Wichmann, Mats D" <mats.d.wichmann@intel.com> writes:

|> I'm finding that utime(filename, NULL) doesn't
|> follow specs - this comes up in plodding through
|> the LSB certification test suite.
|> 
|> For example, if the process does not own the
|> file but has write permission, the above
|> referenced call should succeed but fails with EPERM.
|> 
|> utime() is emulated on Itanium: in the kernel,
|> fs/open.c doesn't have a sys_utime routine 
|> if __ia64__ or alpha; the emulation comes from
|> glibc's sysdeps/unix/utime.c but appears to
|> be bogus.  The problem is that if the second
|> argument to utime is NULL the emulation code
|> does some work to build up a "struct timeval"
|> array as expected by utimes(), and passes that
|> off, instead of passing NULL... and so the
|> proper checks in the NULL case don't get done
|> by the kernel.
|> 
|> I guess this is a query to see if anyone
|> on this list knows anything about this code.
|> Is this just a glibc problem,

Yes.  Here is a patch:

2002-08-06  Andreas Schwab  <schwab@suse.de>

	* sysdeps/unix/utime.c: If TIMES is NULL pass it through to
	utimes.

--- sysdeps/unix/utime.c.~1.3.~	2001-07-16 10:45:00.000000000 +0200
+++ sysdeps/unix/utime.c	2002-08-06 22:29:53.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* Copyright (C) 1991, 1994, 1997 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+/* Copyright (C) 1991, 1994, 1997, 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
    This file is part of the GNU C Library.
 
    The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ utime (file, times)
      const char *file;
      const struct utimbuf *times;
 {
-  struct timeval timevals[2];
+  struct timeval timevals[2], *tvp;
 
   if (times != NULL)
     {
@@ -39,13 +39,10 @@ utime (file, times)
       timevals[0].tv_usec = 0L;
       timevals[1].tv_sec = (long int) times->modtime;
       timevals[1].tv_usec = 0L;
+      tvp = timevals;
     }
   else
-    {
-      if (__gettimeofday (&timevals[0], NULL) < 0)
-	return -1;
-      timevals[1] = timevals[0];
-    }
+    tvp = NULL;
 
-  return __utimes (file, timevals);
+  return __utimes (file, tvp);
 }

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."


      parent reply	other threads:[~2002-08-06 20:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-08-06 19:01 [Linux-ia64] utime emulation Wichmann, Mats D
2002-08-06 20:23 ` David Mosberger
2002-08-06 20:40 ` Andreas Schwab [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590701905920@msgid-missing \
    --to=schwab@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox