public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Hildner <christian.hildner@hob.de>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] Re: loading a kernel module
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 07:56:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709805172@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709805162@msgid-missing>

Keith Owens schrieb:

> On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 07:52:15 +0200,
> Christian Hildner <christian.hildner@hob.de> wrote:
> >the source isn't that complex as you might have seen in the length of the objdump output.
> >The object I have given you is only a small test program to find out the missing linkage for
> >brl branches. My original program needs brl to branch across virtual pages with a big
> >difference in the virtual addresses. So the test prog never makes any sence, but shows the
> >missing R_IA64_PCREL60B nicely.
> >
> >Christian
> >
> >PS: Here is the source without any guarantee not to crash ...
> >
> >#define MODULE
> >#include <linux/module.h>
> >
> >int dummy(void)
> >{
> >    return 0;
> >}
> >
> >int init_module(void)
> >{
> >    printk("Init Module starting. About to crash...\n");
> >    asm volatile ("brl dummy ");
> >    return 0;
> >}
> >
> >void cleanup_module(void)
> >{
> >    printk("Done\n");
> >}
>
> OK, so it is not a toolchain problem, this is user code.  Unfortunately
> it is introducing a special case into modutils.
>
> All existing PCREL relocations in modutils go via a PLT, saving and
> switching GP as they do so.  I am assuming that branching via the PLT
> is no good for you, you really do want a direct branch over the 64 bit
> address space, without any change to GP.  That is, the source and
> target addresses use the same global data area, or one of them does not
> use any global data area at all.  Please confirm this before I make any
> changes.
>
> If you need different GP values in the source and target addresses then
> a normal PCREL21 via PLT will do the job.

What I want to do is a simple branch without any side effects like adjusting GP. I am doing a
branch like brl (local_label + PAGE_OFFSET) where PAGE_OFFSET is the distance between the two
"shadowed" pages. Maybe there is a way to tell the compiler/assembler not to make a linkage entry
for that branch. There is no addressing of any data segment by the means of GP in my program.

Christian



  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-10-16  7:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-15 12:34 [Linux-ia64] Re: loading a kernel module Keith Owens
2002-10-15 18:57 ` Jim Wilson
2002-10-16  1:16 ` Keith Owens
2002-10-16  5:52 ` Christian Hildner
2002-10-16  7:04 ` Keith Owens
2002-10-16  7:56 ` Christian Hildner [this message]
2002-10-16  9:06 ` Christian Hildner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590709805172@msgid-missing \
    --to=christian.hildner@hob.de \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox