From: Erich Focht <efocht@ess.nec.de>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Linux-ia64] Re: O(1) scheduler fix for 2.5-ia64
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 11:35:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709805333@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709805332@msgid-missing>
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 01:22, David Mosberger wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 4 Nov 2002 19:53:07 +0100, Erich Focht <efocht@ess.nec.de>
> >>>>> said:
>
> Erich> Hi David, this problem is wellknown and I actually thought
> Erich> that it was solved. But it looks like the complex
> Erich> prepare_arch_switch() etc. macros didn't make it into the 2.5
> Erich> kernels for IA64. They are needed on IA64 because we have to
> Erich> release the runqueue lock during context switch. This is
> Erich> similar to sparc64. Thanks to John Hawks for noticing this.
>
> Yes, this seems to have fallen through the cracks. Can you remind me
> what the deadlock scenario looked like?
This can happen when the runqueue lock is held during a context switch
which requires wrapping around the context numbers:
Example:
CPU#0:
schedule()
-> spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock)
-> context_switch()
-> wrap_mmu_context()
-> read_lock(&tasklist_lock)
CPU#1:
sys_wait4() or release_task() or forget_original_parent()
-> write_lock(&tasklist_lock)
-> do_notify_parent()
-> wake_up_parent()
-> try_to_wake_up()
-> spin_lock_irq(&parent_rq->lock)
If the parent's rq happens to be on CPU#0, we'll wait for the rq->lock
of that CPU which will not be released, because there we wait for the
tasklist_lock to become available.
Regards,
Erich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-05 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-05 0:22 [Linux-ia64] Re: O(1) scheduler fix for 2.5-ia64 David Mosberger
2002-11-05 11:35 ` Erich Focht [this message]
2002-11-05 18:54 ` David Mosberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590709805333@msgid-missing \
--to=efocht@ess.nec.de \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox