public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Erich Focht <efocht@ess.nec.de>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Linux-ia64] Re: O(1) scheduler fix for 2.5-ia64
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 11:35:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709805333@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709805332@msgid-missing>

On Tuesday 05 November 2002 01:22, David Mosberger wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 4 Nov 2002 19:53:07 +0100, Erich Focht <efocht@ess.nec.de>
> >>>>> said:
>
>   Erich> Hi David, this problem is wellknown and I actually thought
>   Erich> that it was solved. But it looks like the complex
>   Erich> prepare_arch_switch() etc. macros didn't make it into the 2.5
>   Erich> kernels for IA64. They are needed on IA64 because we have to
>   Erich> release the runqueue lock during context switch. This is
>   Erich> similar to sparc64. Thanks to John Hawks for noticing this.
>
> Yes, this seems to have fallen through the cracks.  Can you remind me
> what the deadlock scenario looked like?

This can happen when the runqueue lock is held during a context switch
which requires wrapping around the context numbers:

Example:
CPU#0:
schedule()
   -> spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock)
   -> context_switch()
      -> wrap_mmu_context()
         -> read_lock(&tasklist_lock)


CPU#1:
sys_wait4() or release_task() or forget_original_parent()
   -> write_lock(&tasklist_lock)
   -> do_notify_parent()
      -> wake_up_parent()
         -> try_to_wake_up()
            -> spin_lock_irq(&parent_rq->lock)

If the parent's rq happens to be on CPU#0, we'll wait for the rq->lock
of that CPU which will not be released, because there we wait for the
tasklist_lock to become available.

Regards,
Erich



  reply	other threads:[~2002-11-05 11:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-05  0:22 [Linux-ia64] Re: O(1) scheduler fix for 2.5-ia64 David Mosberger
2002-11-05 11:35 ` Erich Focht [this message]
2002-11-05 18:54 ` David Mosberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590709805333@msgid-missing \
    --to=efocht@ess.nec.de \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox