public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] [PATCH]ACPI fACS global lock & virtual memmap
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 17:32:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709805340@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709805326@msgid-missing>

>>>>> On Fri, 1 Nov 2002 16:14:43 -0600, "Sluder, Charles" <Charles.Sluder@UNISYS.com> said:

  Charles> The first problem was a panic in put_gate_page(). The panic
  Charles> only occurs with CONFIG_VIRTUAL_MEMMAP enabled. The panic
  Charles> results because there is not a pte for the kernel data
  Charles> section.  We traced this back and found that
  Charles> efi_memmap_walk() was indiscriminately "trimming" chunks
  Charles> out of the first 96MB of memory in the efi memory map. The
  Charles> problem appears to be that the first_non_wb_addr variable
  Charles> is not being advanced properly as the code walks through
  Charles> the efi memory descriptors. On the next pass through the
  Charles> outer loop after a hole is encountered in the memmap,
  Charles> first_non_wb_addr is usually pointing at one of the memory
  Charles> descriptors in the previous contiguous segment. It calls
  Charles> the functions to trim the memory descriptor without taking
  Charles> the memory descriptor previous to that into
  Charles> account. Basically the code goes through a contiguous
  Charles> segment, finds a hole, and then, on the next pass, trims a
  Charles> bunch of memory out of the contiguous segment. The problem
  Charles> only occurs if there are numerous holes in the efi memory
  Charles> map. The panic will not occur on a tiger.  The patch sets
  Charles> first_non_wb_addr to either the first non write back
  Charles> address it finds or to the start address in the first
  Charles> memory descriptor after a hole. We do not fully understand
  Charles> all the uses for this routine and are therefore not certain
  Charles> that this is the correct way to fix this problem.

Can you provide a specific example of a (simple) memory map that you
believe causes problems?  It's probably sufficient to give descriptors
for one or two granules (both the descriptor range & type are needed).

Thanks,

	--david


  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-11-06 17:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-01 22:14 [Linux-ia64] [PATCH]ACPI fACS global lock & virtual memmap Sluder, Charles
2002-11-04 15:45 ` Van Maren, Kevin
2002-11-06 17:32 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2002-11-06 23:31 ` David Mosberger
2002-11-06 23:35 ` David Mosberger
2002-11-07  2:52 ` Sluder, Charles
2002-11-07  3:13 ` David Mosberger
2002-11-07 18:02 ` Sluder, Charles

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590709805340@msgid-missing \
    --to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox