public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mario Smarduch <cms063@email.mot.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] Re: memcpy failure
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 16:09:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709805430@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709805424@msgid-missing>

Matthew Wilcox wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 10:01:44AM +010-, Christian Cotte-Barrot wrote:
> > But memcpy from memcpy.S is returning a pointer to dest area.
> > That would lead to quasi non-portable code when the return from memcopy
> > is correctly checked depending on which memcopy function is addressed.
> > But BTW, is it meaningful to take into account a return code
> > that is always the same and which value is known in advance ?
> > Does memcpy suppose to failed in some cases ?
>
> no, memcpy cannot fail (you get a SIGSEGV in userspace or an MCA in
> kernel space).  checking the return value is meaningless.
>
> --
> Revolutions do not require corporate support.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-IA64 mailing list
> Linux-IA64@linuxia64.org
> http://lists.linuxia64.org/lists/listinfo/linux-ia64

>

Aren't all these routines suppose to return -EFAULT if a fault occurs?

- Mario.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-11-14 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-14  9:01 [Linux-ia64] Re: memcpy failure Christian Cotte-Barrot
2002-11-14 12:23 ` Matthew Wilcox
2002-11-14 15:10 ` Don Dugger
2002-11-14 15:47 ` [Linux-ia64] " Chen, Kenneth W
2002-11-14 15:53 ` [Linux-ia64] " Chen, Kenneth W
2002-11-14 16:09 ` Mario Smarduch [this message]
2002-11-14 16:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2002-11-14 19:21 ` Mario Smarduch
2002-11-14 19:37 ` David Mosberger
2002-11-14 20:32 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2002-11-15 10:32 ` Christian Cotte-Barrot
2002-11-15 13:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2002-11-15 13:51 ` Christian Cotte-Barrot
2002-11-15 14:17 ` Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590709805430@msgid-missing \
    --to=cms063@email.mot.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox