RE: [Linux-ia64] New rev 2.1 SDM for Itanium published

Jim Hull
2002-11-22T19:02:24Z

David wrote:

> The ao bit seems to have gotten lost in the final version of SDM2.1.
> It's mentioned (indirectly) in the Document Revision history, but in
> the CPUID[4] description, only "branchlong" and "spontaneous deferral"
> show up.

You're right, the "ao" bit is missing from the final public SDM 2.1. I
wonder how that happened. I'll check into this and see if I can get it
fixed.

-- Jim