public inbox for linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [Linux-ia64] RE: ia64 rwsem using atomic primitive
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 20:09:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709805880@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709805873@msgid-missing>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 701 bytes --]

Hi David,

Here it is again with the CR-LF removed.  Sorry.

- Ken

-----Original Message-----
From: David Mosberger [mailto:davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 11:53 AM
To: Chen, Kenneth W
Cc: linux-ia64@linuxia64.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] RE: ia64 rwsem using atomic primitive


>>>>> On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:31:33 -0800, "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com> said:

  Ken> Here is a patch against 2.5.60.  It has one new function added
  Ken> __downgrade_write() for 2.5.  - Ken

I glanced over the patch and it looks fine, except that it has CR-LF
for end-of-line.  Could you resend with the carriage-returns removed?

Thanks,

	--david

[-- Attachment #2: rwsem.2.5.60.patch --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 5225 bytes --]

diff -Nur linux-2.5.60/arch/ia64/Kconfig linux-2.5.60.rwsem/arch/ia64/Kconfig
--- linux-2.5.60/arch/ia64/Kconfig	Mon Feb 10 10:38:54 2003
+++ linux-2.5.60.rwsem/arch/ia64/Kconfig	Wed Feb 19 00:32:37 2003
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 	bool
 	default y
 
-config RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK
+config RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM
 	bool
 	default y
 
diff -Nur linux-2.5.60/include/asm-ia64/rwsem.h linux-2.5.60.rwsem/include/asm-ia64/rwsem.h
--- linux-2.5.60/include/asm-ia64/rwsem.h	Wed Dec 31 16:00:00 1969
+++ linux-2.5.60.rwsem/include/asm-ia64/rwsem.h	Wed Feb 19 10:21:12 2003
@@ -0,0 +1,188 @@
+/*
+ * asm-ia64/rwsem.h: R/W semaphores for ia64
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2003 Ken Chen <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
+ * Copyright (C) 2003 Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>
+ *
+ * Based on asm-i386/rwsem.h and other architecture implementation.
+ *
+ * The MSW of the count is the negated number of active writers and
+ * waiting lockers, and the LSW is the total number of active locks.
+ *
+ * The lock count is initialized to 0 (no active and no waiting lockers).
+ *
+ * When a writer subtracts WRITE_BIAS, it'll get 0xffff0001 for the case
+ * of an uncontended lock. Readers increment by 1 and see a positive value
+ * when uncontended, negative if there are writers (and maybe) readers
+ * waiting (in which case it goes to sleep).
+ */
+
+#ifndef _IA64_RWSEM_H
+#define _IA64_RWSEM_H
+
+#ifdef __KERNEL__
+#include <linux/list.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+
+/*
+ * the semaphore definition
+ */
+struct rw_semaphore {
+	signed int		count;
+	spinlock_t		wait_lock;
+	struct list_head	wait_list;
+#if RWSEM_DEBUG
+	int			debug;
+#endif
+};
+
+#define RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE		0x00000000
+#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS		0x00000001
+#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK		0x0000ffff
+#define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS		(-0x00010000)
+#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS		RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS
+#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS		(RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS + RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS)
+
+/*
+ * initialization
+ */
+#if RWSEM_DEBUG
+#define __RWSEM_DEBUG_INIT      , 0
+#else
+#define __RWSEM_DEBUG_INIT	/* */
+#endif
+
+#define __RWSEM_INITIALIZER(name) \
+	{ RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE, SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED, \
+	  LIST_HEAD_INIT((name).wait_list) \
+	  __RWSEM_DEBUG_INIT }
+
+#define DECLARE_RWSEM(name) \
+	struct rw_semaphore name = __RWSEM_INITIALIZER(name)
+
+extern struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_down_write_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_downgrade_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+
+static inline void init_rwsem(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+	sem->count = RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE;
+	spin_lock_init(&sem->wait_lock);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sem->wait_list);
+#if RWSEM_DEBUG
+	sem->debug = 0;
+#endif
+}
+
+/*
+ * lock for reading
+ */
+static inline void __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+	int result;
+	__asm__ __volatile__ ("fetchadd4.acq %0=[%1],1" :
+			      "=r"(result) : "r"(&sem->count) : "memory");
+	if (result < 0)
+		rwsem_down_read_failed(sem);
+}
+
+/*
+ * lock for writing
+ */
+static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+	int old, new;
+
+	do {
+		old = sem->count;
+		new = old + RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS;
+	} while (cmpxchg_acq(&sem->count, old, new) != old);
+
+	if (old != 0)
+		rwsem_down_write_failed(sem);
+}
+
+/*
+ * unlock after reading
+ */
+static inline void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+	int result;
+	__asm__ __volatile__ ("fetchadd4.rel %0=[%1],-1" :
+			      "=r"(result) : "r"(&sem->count) : "memory");
+	if (result < 0 && (--result & RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK) == 0)
+		rwsem_wake(sem);
+}
+
+/*
+ * unlock after writing
+ */
+static inline void __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+	int old, new;
+
+	do {
+		old = sem->count;
+		new = old - RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS;
+	} while (cmpxchg_rel(&sem->count, old, new) != old);
+
+	if (new < 0 && (new & RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK) == 0)
+		rwsem_wake(sem);
+}
+
+/*
+ * trylock for reading -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention
+ */
+static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+	int tmp;
+	while ((tmp = sem->count) >= 0) {
+		if (tmp == cmpxchg_acq(&sem->count, tmp, tmp+1)) {
+			return 1;
+		}
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * trylock for writing -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention
+ */
+static inline int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+	int tmp = cmpxchg_acq(&sem->count, RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE,
+			  RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS);
+	return tmp == RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE;
+}
+
+/*
+ * downgrade write lock to read lock
+ */
+static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+	int old, new;
+
+	do {
+		old = sem->count;
+		new = old - RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS;
+	} while (cmpxchg_rel(&sem->count, old, new) != old);
+
+	if (old < 0)
+		rwsem_downgrade_wake(sem);
+}
+
+/*
+ * implement atomic add functionality
+ */
+static inline void rwsem_atomic_add(int delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+	atomic_add(delta, (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
+}
+
+static inline int rwsem_atomic_update(int delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+	return atomic_add_return(delta, (atomic_t *)(&sem->count));
+}
+
+#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
+#endif /* _IA64_RWSEM_H */

      parent reply	other threads:[~2003-02-19 20:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-19 18:31 [Linux-ia64] RE: ia64 rwsem using atomic primitive Chen, Kenneth W
2003-02-19 19:52 ` David Mosberger
2003-02-19 20:09 ` Chen, Kenneth W [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590709805880@msgid-missing \
    --to=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox