Matt Domsch wrote:

> > We'll issue a clarification on this topic. For now, can we have parted
> > revert to GPT_HEADER_REVISION_V1_00 ?
>
> No objections.  Will you be submitting a patch, or should I?
>

The attached patch worked fine for me. When looking at a GPT with 
revision number 1.02, parted complains about a newer version number it 
doesn't know about, but if the user ignores it and flips a flag on one 
of the GPT partitions twice (essentially a nop), the GPT revision number 
gets downgraded to 1.0.

    -Arun