From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] provide /proc/sal/itc_drift through AUX?
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 23:54:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705275@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705273@msgid-missing>
>>>>> On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:39:31 -0500, Jes Sorensen <jes@wildopensource.com> said:
Jes> Hi I was wondering what people think about providing the
Jes> information of /proc/sal/itc_drift as an AUX vector?
Jes> The problem is that on some NUMA boxen (such as the SGI boxes),
Jes> the ITC isn't synchronized across nodes and we can't rely on
Jes> ar.itc in userland for implementing the high-precision
Jes> timing. I believe the IBM NUMA-Q team has a similar problem
Jes> that could be solved in a similar way on ia32?
Jes> Instead one can switch to using gettimeofday() for the timing,
Jes> which with the new fast syscalls should be quite pleasant.
Jes> I have a patch which implements this for glibc-2.2 (will do 2.3
Jes> later), however what I don't like about it is that one ends up
Jes> opening and reading /proc/sal/itc_drift in every single binary
Jes> executed. To avoid the overhead of this it seems a good idea to
Jes> me to provide this information via an AUX vector.
Jes> If anybody is interested in the glibc patch, feel free to grab
Jes> it from
Jes> http://www.wildopensource.com/~jes/glibc/itc-drift-patch.diff
Jes> For now it's a test patch, though it does seem to behave as
Jes> expected.
Jes> Thoughts?
Why do you need to export it if you just use a light-weight
gettimeofday()? The light-weight syscall can readily access the
ITC-drift info via kernel memory.
BTW: I think someone should explore using an NTP-like approach to keep
ITC drift small enough that it's still usable for ITC-based
interpolation. Granted, this assumes that hw drifts are reasonably
small and you'd still need to worry about different clock-frequencies,
but I suspect that in practice, this would work extremely well. It
would be nice because it would be much faster than an HPET-based
approach, would work on all ia64 machines, and would provide better
resolution. Furthermore, we already have all the logic in the
time-interpolation to ensure that there is never an observable time
discontinuity.
--david
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-19 23:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-19 21:39 [Linux-ia64] provide /proc/sal/itc_drift through AUX? Jes Sorensen
2003-03-19 23:54 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2003-03-20 2:06 ` Jes Sorensen
2003-03-20 19:57 ` David Mosberger
2003-03-20 23:55 ` Rich Altmaier
2003-03-21 0:43 ` David Mosberger
2003-03-21 2:04 ` Jes Sorensen
2003-03-21 17:49 ` Jes Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590723705275@msgid-missing \
--to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox