From: Finn Arne Gangstad <Finn.Gangstad@fast.no>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Linux-ia64] Re: [PATCH] fix nanosleep() granularity bumps
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 12:06:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705296@msgid-missing> (raw)
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 10:05:56AM +0100, Tim Schmielau wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Tim Schmielau wrote:
>
> > I've re-checked that the problem does not occur with the original "initial
> > jiffies" patch for 2.4.
>
> Stupid me - 2.4 with the patch has the same problem, it just takes 10x as
> long to show up, a range that was not covered by the testcase.
>
>
> The actual problem is that I didn't fully understand the, well,
> 'elaborated' way of counting jiffies in the timer cascade:
>
> When starting out with timer_jiffies=0, the timer cascade is
> (unneccessarily) triggered on the first timer interrupt, incrementing all
> the higher indices.
> When starting with any other initial jiffies value, we miss that and end
> up with all higher indices being off by one.
Suggest the attached patch as a fix instead - easier to understand I
think and works for every possible start value. This is what I made for
Andrea Arcangeli many years ago...
diff -ur linux-2.5.65/kernel/timer.c linux-2.5.65-new/kernel/timer.c
--- linux-2.5.65/kernel/timer.c 2003-03-17 22:44:41.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.5.65-new/kernel/timer.c 2003-03-24 12:57:31.000000000 +0100
@@ -1182,11 +1182,14 @@
INIT_LIST_HEAD(base->tv1.vec + j);
base->timer_jiffies = INITIAL_JIFFIES;
- base->tv1.index = INITIAL_JIFFIES & TVR_MASK;
- base->tv2.index = (INITIAL_JIFFIES >> TVR_BITS) & TVN_MASK;
- base->tv3.index = (INITIAL_JIFFIES >> (TVR_BITS+TVN_BITS)) & TVN_MASK;
- base->tv4.index = (INITIAL_JIFFIES >> (TVR_BITS+2*TVN_BITS)) & TVN_MASK;
- base->tv5.index = (INITIAL_JIFFIES >> (TVR_BITS+3*TVN_BITS)) & TVN_MASK;
+ base->tv1.index = (1 + (INITIAL_JIFFIES - 1)) & TVR_MASK;
+ base->tv2.index = (1 + ((INITIAL_JIFFIES - 1) >> TVR_BITS)) & TVN_MASK;
+ base->tv3.index = (1 + ((INITIAL_JIFFIES - 1)
+ >> (TVR_BITS + TVN_BITS))) & TVN_MASK;
+ base->tv4.index = (1 + ((INITIAL_JIFFIES - 1)
+ >> (TVR_BITS + 2 * TVN_BITS))) & TVN_MASK;
+ base->tv5.index = (1 + ((INITIAL_JIFFIES - 1)
+ >> (TVR_BITS + 3 * TVN_BITS))) & TVN_MASK;
}
static int __devinit timer_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
- Finn Arne
next reply other threads:[~2003-03-24 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-24 12:06 Finn Arne Gangstad [this message]
2003-03-24 12:10 ` [Linux-ia64] Re: [PATCH] fix nanosleep() granularity bumps Tim Schmielau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590723705296@msgid-missing \
--to=finn.gangstad@fast.no \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox